1976
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(76)90015-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of procedures for the analysis and design of concrete structures to resist missile impact effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
165
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
165
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The penetration equations chosen for comparison were the Modified NDRC Formula, the Amman and Whitney Formula, the formula developed by Forrestal in 1994, and the Kar Formula [1,5,6]. Three of these four formulas were chosen for comparison because the experimentally measured projectile mass and striking velocities do not exceed the stated equation limitations.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Penetration Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penetration equations chosen for comparison were the Modified NDRC Formula, the Amman and Whitney Formula, the formula developed by Forrestal in 1994, and the Kar Formula [1,5,6]. Three of these four formulas were chosen for comparison because the experimentally measured projectile mass and striking velocities do not exceed the stated equation limitations.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Penetration Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside of that influence of RHA into admixture improves the strength of concrete [3]. The resistance of impact loading identified with penetration depth of the local damaged phenomena is called cratering [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problems facing the usage of reinforced concrete to resist impact loading that may cause penetration or perforation of slabs in buildings, shelters,….etc are much smallness in ductility of concrete slabs and needing of big slab thickness or great reinforcing steel ratio in slab section [1] H.D. Wright et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%