2019
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Predictive Low Glucose Suspend and Its Effectiveness in Preventing Nocturnal Hypoglycemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…T1D patients using MDI therapy are more exposed to NH than SAP users [29,30], thus more effort should be directed towards this group. The present work evaluates the feasibility of machine-learning-based prediction models to forecast the occurrence of NH, considering data related with T1D management under MDI therapy and also physical activity tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T1D patients using MDI therapy are more exposed to NH than SAP users [29,30], thus more effort should be directed towards this group. The present work evaluates the feasibility of machine-learning-based prediction models to forecast the occurrence of NH, considering data related with T1D management under MDI therapy and also physical activity tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 Today's more advanced integrated systems with LGS, PLGS, and HCL technologies have demonstrated both clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness in T1D compared with insulin pump therapy alone due to improved glycemic control and reductions in hypoglycemia. 72,75,77,80,81,95,96 A 2019 cost-effectiveness model among 2 T1D cohorts in the Netherlands showed that among participants with suboptimal glycemic control, LGS improved qualityadjusted life expectancy by 1.77 QALYs versus insulin pump therapy alone, with higher lifetime costs (EUR 189 855 vs EUR 150 366), resulting in an ICER of EUR 22 325 per QALY gained 81 For those with an increased risk for hypoglycemia, the use of the system was associated with a 2.16 increase in QALYs with higher lifetime costs (EUR 204 013 vs EUR 171 032), leading to an ICER of EUR 15 243 per QALY gained. 81 The investigators concluded that among individuals with suboptimal glycemic control and/or higher risk for hypoglycemia, switching from CSII without CGM to an integrated system with LGS is cost-effective and will likely result in long-term clinical gains.…”
Section: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooled estimates from a recent meta-analysis showed that overnight periods of PLGS use were associated with an 8.8% lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia than non-PLGS use, which would likely lead to significantly reduced costs. 95 With HCL systems, cost benefits are more definitive. As demonstrated in a 2019 Swedish study, the use of the only HCL system commercially available was associated with a QALY gain of 1.90.…”
Section: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…97 No studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of these features in reducing the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia in T2D; studies are limited to the T1D population. 98,99 With the recognition that postprandial glycaemic excursions are particularly challenging, the next phase of development was a "hybrid" closed-loop system, which requires meal announcements and initiation of a pump-delivered meal bolus by the user. The basal rate is automated for the remainder of the time between meals.…”
Section: Glucose-responsive Insulin Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier features of glucose responsive insulin delivery systems include the low glucose suspend feature which interrupts insulin delivery below a defined glucose threshold, and predictive low glucose suspend which predicts pending hypoglycaemia and suspends insulin delivery in advance 93 . No studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of these features in reducing frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia in T2D, studies are limited to the T1D population 94 , 95 …”
Section: Glucose Responsive Insulin Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%