2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of post-modern management techniques as currently applied to Turkish forestry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a few years after the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923, the new Forest Code nationalized privately owned forests of larger than 5 ha (1945) and, later, of 3 ha (1950). The current system of centralized management of forests has led to standard planning processes conducted by forest management committees and has allowed local citizen input in planning processes (Dölarslan 2009). It has been argued that the privatization of land in Turkey is, socially and culturally, a disadvantage to the sustainable management of forests (Guneş and Coşkun 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within a few years after the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923, the new Forest Code nationalized privately owned forests of larger than 5 ha (1945) and, later, of 3 ha (1950). The current system of centralized management of forests has led to standard planning processes conducted by forest management committees and has allowed local citizen input in planning processes (Dölarslan 2009). It has been argued that the privatization of land in Turkey is, socially and culturally, a disadvantage to the sustainable management of forests (Guneş and Coşkun 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, local citizen input in forest planning processes is generally only mandatory for public (state and national) forests. Due to the largely decentralized land tenure situation, technological innovation and the use of total quality management processes are generally only considered by landowners or loggers, while in Turkey these are considered by state management agencies (Dölarslan 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies evaluated different sets of methods as for example TQM, JIT, core competence, outsourcing, network organizations and ben chmarking, so the results are neither compatible nor com parable (Dölarsan 2009).…”
Section: Limitation Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%