2019
DOI: 10.1080/21520704.2018.1563574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of “Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, both groups of experts unanimously stated that it takes a lot of hard work for a long time to achieve eminence. Several TD experts used the term “deliberate practice,” which refers to a type of focused and effortful practice with the purpose of improving incrementally 36,38,40 . Although STEMM experts did not use the term, they concurred by providing examples of deliberate practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, both groups of experts unanimously stated that it takes a lot of hard work for a long time to achieve eminence. Several TD experts used the term “deliberate practice,” which refers to a type of focused and effortful practice with the purpose of improving incrementally 36,38,40 . Although STEMM experts did not use the term, they concurred by providing examples of deliberate practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Talent researchers 5,6,36,37 suggested that it takes a minimum of 10 years, or an equivalent of 10,000 h, of deliberate practice in a domain for an individual to reach an expert level. The 10‐year (or 10,000‐h) rule stresses not only the quantity of time spent on learning and practice but also the quality of learning effort and practice, as a practice must be carried out deliberately 38 . Thus, deliberate practice refers to a type of focused and effortful practice that is aimed at incremental improvement, and there is ample evidence illustrating that this type of practice improves learning 36,39–41 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue with numerical thresholds is that while intended to reflect minimum requirements (the “floor” for competency), thresholds are often treated psychologically as the putative target, the “ceiling.” In fact, relying upon numbers of cases or hours of experience likely correlates poorly with competency in the trainee who performs procedures without reflecting on the experience or otherwise understanding or recognizing what is needed to achieve a successful result. Hours of experience must be “purposeful”—having a specific goal with role models to emulate, mentors to guide and offer specific feedback, and a chance to integrate the feedback 21–22 …”
Section: Discussion: Numerical Thresholds Purposeful Practice and Mea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediate feedback on one's performance is the third step, necessary for validation or rectification of task accuracy. The final step is for the learner to be consistent and maintain regular practice once proficiency is reached, while aiming for expertise (Ericsson & Pool, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%