2023
DOI: 10.1177/17407745231219270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of patient recruitment in randomised controlled trials of preoperative exercise

Daniel Steffens,
Michael Solomon,
Jane Young
et al.

Abstract: Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention, as the only method of decreasing section bias and minimising random error. However, participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials is a major challenge, with many trials failing to recruit the targeted sample size accordingly to the planned protocol. Thus, the aim of this review is to detail the recruitment challenges of preoperative exercise clinical trials. Method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A core outcome & measurement set is desperately needed in this field and hopefully the Defining Standards in Colorectal Optimisation (DiSCO) Study will report soon [3]. Secondly, the design and conduct of the available RCTs has been called into question [4]. The trials have sample sizes that vary by over an order of magnitude and relatively low rates of recruitment compared to the number screened, which raises concerns regarding external validity and applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A core outcome & measurement set is desperately needed in this field and hopefully the Defining Standards in Colorectal Optimisation (DiSCO) Study will report soon [3]. Secondly, the design and conduct of the available RCTs has been called into question [4]. The trials have sample sizes that vary by over an order of magnitude and relatively low rates of recruitment compared to the number screened, which raises concerns regarding external validity and applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%