2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01177-2_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Path Smoothness Approaches for Non-holonomic Mobile Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smooth path generation for mobile robots is usually accomplished by either of the two approaches, each having its own advantages and disadvantages. The first approach applies a kinematic constraint model during the path planning phase [12,13,15,19]. However, non-holonomic constraints require the addition of a robot's orientation to state vector of planner.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Smooth path generation for mobile robots is usually accomplished by either of the two approaches, each having its own advantages and disadvantages. The first approach applies a kinematic constraint model during the path planning phase [12,13,15,19]. However, non-holonomic constraints require the addition of a robot's orientation to state vector of planner.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories generated a linear piecewise path for semi-autonomous vehicles [29] using RRT* [24] and later applied post-processing smoothing to generate a G 2 continuous smooth path to meet differential constraints of robotic vehicles. Parametric curves such as Bézier and Splines have been widely used for post-processing path smoothing approaches [12,19,26]. Yang et al introduced Bézier based smoothing techniques [21][22][23][24] and generated a G 2 continuous path [21,22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations