2012
DOI: 10.4103/1117-1936.169667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of obesity and orthopaedic surgery: The critical issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obesity and higher comorbidity scores were also found to be risk factors for postoperative complications in both QTR and PTR groups, which is consistent with prior reports [18, 20]. The effect of obesity on surgical outcomes has been well‐documented and could be related to issues associated with increased cardiopulmonary risks, nutrition and medication adjustments, and changes in instrumentation, surgical approach, and patient positioning [13, 23, 29]. Similarly, other comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, which is associated with a 100–300% increase in risk for additional diseases such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, and cerebrovascular accidents, have been shown to negatively influence surgical outcomes [10, 22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Obesity and higher comorbidity scores were also found to be risk factors for postoperative complications in both QTR and PTR groups, which is consistent with prior reports [18, 20]. The effect of obesity on surgical outcomes has been well‐documented and could be related to issues associated with increased cardiopulmonary risks, nutrition and medication adjustments, and changes in instrumentation, surgical approach, and patient positioning [13, 23, 29]. Similarly, other comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, which is associated with a 100–300% increase in risk for additional diseases such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, and cerebrovascular accidents, have been shown to negatively influence surgical outcomes [10, 22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%