2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(01)00274-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of no-till systems and soil management for sustainable crop production in the subhumid and semiarid Pampas of Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
91
1
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
91
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil moisture storage was observed to maximum under HS due to mulching effect, interception of rainfall and reduction of runoff caused by loose straw and standing rice stubbles. These results are consistent with those reported by others researchers (Mahboubi et al, 1993;Diaz-Zorita et al, 2002;Bhattacharyya et al, 2008). Minimum soil profile moisture storage was observed under NT where whole of the crop residue was removed after paddy harvesting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Soil moisture storage was observed to maximum under HS due to mulching effect, interception of rainfall and reduction of runoff caused by loose straw and standing rice stubbles. These results are consistent with those reported by others researchers (Mahboubi et al, 1993;Diaz-Zorita et al, 2002;Bhattacharyya et al, 2008). Minimum soil profile moisture storage was observed under NT where whole of the crop residue was removed after paddy harvesting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These rates are considerably higher than the 10-43 kg ha −1 reported for cereal production in other areas of the world (Lal, 1981;Bauer and Black, 1994;Díaz-Zorita et al, 2002;Pan et al, 2009 should be applied to the soil (most effectively as animal manure) given that 9% of the C input is sequestered (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Relative Yield Response To Enhancement Of Soc Stocksmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Rooting is often shallower in no-till (NT) than in conventional tillage (CT) because of favorable soil water conditions (Vyn, 2008). Higher soil water storage is normally observed under NT as compared to CT (Diaz Zorita et al, 2002;He et al, 2006;Bhattacharyya et al, 2008), and higher root length density (RLD) is observed under straw mulch than unmulched plots (Hossain et al, 2008). Mechanical impedance, the resistance offered by the soil matrix against deformation by a growing root, is also a major factor inhibiting root growth (Amato & Ritchie, 2002;Duruoha et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%