2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2000.tb00976.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Natural Resource Valuation Through National Income Accounting

Abstract: is pursuing a PhD at the Graduate School of Environment, Macquarie University. I would like to thank Professor DJ. Thampapillai, Graduate School of Environment, Macquarie University, Dr J.A. Doeleman, Visiting Lecturer, Graduate School of Environment, Macquarie University, Ms Seeme Mallick and Ms Robin Coombes, Library, Macquarie University for their useful comments and suggestions.55 1. The net revenue from sales of a natural resource is divided into user cost and value added.The user cost represents the capi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, carbon is the main pollutant produced by the burning of fossil fuel. So far, there have been many attempts [Pearce (1993); Repetto, et al (1991), Tongeren, et al (1991], but no universally acceptable method to value depreciation of natural resources at the macro level and so a proxy must be used [Ahmed (2000)].…”
Section: Five Year Averagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, carbon is the main pollutant produced by the burning of fossil fuel. So far, there have been many attempts [Pearce (1993); Repetto, et al (1991), Tongeren, et al (1991], but no universally acceptable method to value depreciation of natural resources at the macro level and so a proxy must be used [Ahmed (2000)].…”
Section: Five Year Averagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the fourteen years between 1971 and 1984, the GDP growth was on average at 7 percent, whereas the Repetto's sustainable GDP showed an average growth rate of 4 percent. The 3 percent gap in these growth rates was the environmental cost of economic development [Ahmed (2000)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%