2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of multiscale CFD for gas–solid CFB modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, most of the CFD riser simulations remain limited to calculating the flow in a simplified 2-D riser domain, making it impossible to reconstruct the 3D nature of the flow in the riser. In view of the importance of flow structures, the simplified approach does not allow to determine the real mechanisms underlying the complex state of motion [2]. As a consequence, hydrodynamic modeling of a riser has not yet been entirely successful [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, most of the CFD riser simulations remain limited to calculating the flow in a simplified 2-D riser domain, making it impossible to reconstruct the 3D nature of the flow in the riser. In view of the importance of flow structures, the simplified approach does not allow to determine the real mechanisms underlying the complex state of motion [2]. As a consequence, hydrodynamic modeling of a riser has not yet been entirely successful [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the fact that acceptable general theory is not yet developed for all flow conditions heavily affects its application. Moreover, it was found that the TFM may overestimate the drag coefficient without sub-grid structures treatment (Wang, et al, 2010) for common grid methods.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of a Self-leveling Experiments Using A Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of hydrodynamic modeling for the gase solid flow, the numerical simulation for the flow character has become an important and effective method for the CFBs' research [16]. There are two different approaches might be used to simulate the gasesolid flow, namely the Lagrangian and the Eulerian methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%