2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45033-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Multidatabase Transactions on the Web: From the ACID to the SACReD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the performance evaluation of the classical commit protocols it is assumed that component transactions are processed in parallel [16] and hence the increase in the number of component transaction does not affect the overall processing time of a transaction. However, in context-aware transactions this assumption may not be valid due to the characteristics of M-services.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the performance evaluation of the classical commit protocols it is assumed that component transactions are processed in parallel [16] and hence the increase in the number of component transaction does not affect the overall processing time of a transaction. However, in context-aware transactions this assumption may not be valid due to the characteristics of M-services.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service reservation is required in order to avoid blocking of services. As described earlier, context-aware transactions are generally of longer duration and thus it is not feasible to use the classical locking protocols such as two-phase locking [16] -where a service can be locked by a single transaction and no other transactions can access that service (e.g., a table in a restaurant) until the lock is released. In the following, we adopt the W3C Tentative Hold Protocol (THP) [7] that allows multiple transactions to tentatively reserve the same service at the same time.…”
Section: The System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in M-services it is desirable that a transaction reacts to the contextual information and adapts its behaviour according to the changes in context. Furthermore, current approaches are generally based on the conventional ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) criteria [16]. Such criteria require that a transaction must not expose its intermediate results (isolation) and must be atomic; all its actions must be carried out or none is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we see that problematic. Accordingly, our paper proposes a relaxed set of transaction correctness criteria, called SACReD (Semantic Atomicity, Consistency, Resiliency, Durability) (previously developed in [15,16]) and a protocol for enforcing them, which it argues are more appropriate to the context-aware, more volatile, dynamic and open nature of M-services transactions. Unlike ACID criteria, SACReD do not impose isolation policy thus allowing transaction to be partially committed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%