2011
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of multi-criteria decision making techniques for supplier evaluation and selection

Abstract: Supplier evaluation and selection has been a vital issue of strategic importance for long time. Different multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches have been proposed by the researchers in past, to solve the supplier evaluation and selection problem. In this paper, we present a review of various MCDM methodologies reported in the literature for solving the supplier evaluation and selection process. The review is solely based on sixty-eight research articles, including eight review articles in the academ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Supplier selection has been shown to have a great potential to improve both the buying firm's and the supplier's performance (Monczka et al, 1993;Krause, 1997;Vickery et al, 2003;Li et al, 2012). As such, this area has been researched extensively and we refer the reader to literature reviews focusing on the selection criteria and decision-making process (Weber et al, 1991;De Boer et al, 2001;Aissaoui et al, 2007;Ho et al, 2010;Agarwal et al, 2011), as well as "green" supplier selection (Govindan et al, 2013). Research has begun to shift away from more simple transaction cost economic approaches (Williamson, 1985;Dyer, 1997) and toward social capital theories (Krause et al, 2007;Carey et al, 2011), which capture more of the nuances of the inter-firm dynamics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplier selection has been shown to have a great potential to improve both the buying firm's and the supplier's performance (Monczka et al, 1993;Krause, 1997;Vickery et al, 2003;Li et al, 2012). As such, this area has been researched extensively and we refer the reader to literature reviews focusing on the selection criteria and decision-making process (Weber et al, 1991;De Boer et al, 2001;Aissaoui et al, 2007;Ho et al, 2010;Agarwal et al, 2011), as well as "green" supplier selection (Govindan et al, 2013). Research has begun to shift away from more simple transaction cost economic approaches (Williamson, 1985;Dyer, 1997) and toward social capital theories (Krause et al, 2007;Carey et al, 2011), which capture more of the nuances of the inter-firm dynamics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These criteria are related with a supplier's consideration to environmental and safety issues. Most of these criteria are qualitative and unstable in nature and, therefore, a fuzzybased multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method can be proven beneficial for their characterization [5]. In the category of fuzzy-based MCDM, two classes of methods can be broadly identified.…”
Section: Biomass Supplier Evaluation Criteria and Supplier Selection mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models comprise such practices, as the AHP, ANP, CBR, DEA, fuzzy set theory, GA, mathematical programming, SMART, and their hybrid variants. Different researchers have studied the works in the past relating the supplier evaluation and selection problem [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. At the present time, sustainable development has turn out to be a buzzword that acknowledged a lot of attentions in numerous fields like manufacturing [25], business development [26], tourism [27] and agriculture [28].…”
Section: Sustainable Supplier Selection (Sss)mentioning
confidence: 99%