2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of molecular imaging studies reaching the clinical stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of targeted contrast agents for ultrasound imaging also has potential for future use in MI (17,18), although the use of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging has progressed much more slowly than anticipated 10 years ago. A review of MI substances that have reached clinical trials or clinical use has recently been published (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of targeted contrast agents for ultrasound imaging also has potential for future use in MI (17,18), although the use of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging has progressed much more slowly than anticipated 10 years ago. A review of MI substances that have reached clinical trials or clinical use has recently been published (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to visualizing certain biological events associated with a specific disease in real time not only provides a more meaningful understanding of the molecular basis of disease but also leads to earlier detection, accurate evaluation of the state or degree of disease, and the opportunity to evaluate therapeutic effects (Figure 1) [5, 6]. Molecular imaging allows direct biological measurement(s) in vivo of specific molecular states, gene function, metabolic processes and protein-protein interactions in a repetitive, non-invasive matter, helping clinicians to select the appropriate treatment according to patient’s molecular phenotypes [7, 8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the clinical imaging, the major differences PET and SPECT in QbD are related to the properties and applications of a radiotracer. The most commonly used nuclides for PET imaging, such as carbon-11, oxygen-15, nitrogen-13, and fluorine-18, exhibit shorter half-life and more complicated labelling technology than that for SPECT imaging (Table 1) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. For example, the short half-lives of radionuclides used in PET modality allow for better de-tection sensitivity over a given period of time.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%