1989
DOI: 10.1109/69.43409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of Macsyma

Abstract: We review the successes and failures of the Macsyma algebraic manipulation system from the point of view of one of the original contributors. We provide a retrospective examination of some of the controversial ideas that worked, and some that did not. We consider input/output, language semantics, data types, pattern matching, knowledge-adjunction, mathematical semantics, the user community, and software engineering. We also comment on the porting of this system to a variety of computing systems, and possible f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather more detailed and technical comparisons are to be found in Stoutemeyer (1991), while two magnificent articles by Fateman give critiques of MACSYMA and MATHEMATICA which should be required reading for all serious users of computer algebra; Fateman (1989Fateman ( ), (1992.…”
Section: -3174 9 1994 Chapman and Hallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather more detailed and technical comparisons are to be found in Stoutemeyer (1991), while two magnificent articles by Fateman give critiques of MACSYMA and MATHEMATICA which should be required reading for all serious users of computer algebra; Fateman (1989Fateman ( ), (1992.…”
Section: -3174 9 1994 Chapman and Hallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting in-depth discussions of MACSYMA and Mathernatica are to be found in FATEMAN (1989), FATEMAN (1992). DAVENPORT, SIRET and TOURNIER (1988) discuss the general techniques and algorithms of computer algebra and also provide a useful succinct description of REDUCE.…”
Section: Macsymamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative strategy would be for us to interface with a computer algebra system such as MAXIMA (an open-source fork of MACSYMA [Fateman 1989]) or similar system that uses pattern matching of mathematical expressions to improve symbolic integration performance [Slagle 1963;Harrington 1979]. It is unclear how difficult this would be to implement.…”
Section: Symbolic Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We currently use our own implementation of symbolic integration optimized for (and only applicable to) polynomials. To scale effectively, we suspect interfacing with a computer algebra system such as MAXIMA (an open-source fork of MACSYMA [Fateman 1989]) would be necessary. Our factorizer is only presented with the polynomial parts of expressions so the non-affine mappings would not cause an issue for this step.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation