2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-02012-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of machine learning techniques for process and performance optimization in laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leveraging ML methods to investigate defect features of different defect types from XCT requires understanding different ML methods 37 . In general, high-resolution XCT images can improve the classification accuracy of ML methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging ML methods to investigate defect features of different defect types from XCT requires understanding different ML methods 37 . In general, high-resolution XCT images can improve the classification accuracy of ML methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…explore: This mode selects amount the identified expanders to increase system understanding. In this way the interpretability of our presented approach can be valuable for industrial applications (Liu et al, 2022). It is not to be understood as an optimization mode.…”
Section: Interaction Modesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Spatter ejections are either caused by a vapor-driven entrapment of powder particles or by unstable solid-liquid transitions leading to molten material ejections (Liu et al, 2015;Khairallah et al, 2016;Ly et al, 2017). The interested reader is referred to McCann et al, 2021;Kumar et al, 2022;Li et al, 2020;Tercan & Meisen, 2022;Liu et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022) for review studies devoted to these phenomena and to the development of process monitoring tools in L-PBF.…”
Section: Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 99%