2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
248
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
248
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although optogenetics or implanted electrodes would be ideal for this task, there are few situations in which these can be used in human subjects. A more practical method would be to use focused ultrasound [43] or high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to deliver an appropriate signal to the brain. 18 Alternatively, it might be possible to use an inverse model to cancel out the sensory contingencies of a particular channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although optogenetics or implanted electrodes would be ideal for this task, there are few situations in which these can be used in human subjects. A more practical method would be to use focused ultrasound [43] or high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to deliver an appropriate signal to the brain. 18 Alternatively, it might be possible to use an inverse model to cancel out the sensory contingencies of a particular channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic stimulation technology achieves noninvasive possibilities, but there are limitations of parameter measurement imbalance and technical feasibility of focusing on the area of action. On the other hand, the magnetic field spatial resolution limits feasibility when it in the deep brain stimulation [18]. Ultrasound, as a safe, noninvasive, spatial resolution and noninvasive means, is increasingly recognized for disease diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the exact mechanism of LIFUS is unknown, prior studies have suggested that lower power sonications can cause either inhibitory or excitatory effects which are reversible. 31 The threshold for thermal ablation is not met with lower intensity sonications. Tufail et al observed clinical motor contraction following stimulation of the motor cortex of mice, 32 while others have described reversible suppression of visual-evoked potentials using LIFUS.…”
Section: The Future Of Focused Ultrasound Low-intensity Focused Ultramentioning
confidence: 99%