2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of liquefied natural gas refueling station designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The promotion of LNG requires supporting facilities, the most important is LNG filling station. However, the actual promotion effect will be restricted by many factors, such as social and economic factors [11 , 13] . Since the construction and operation of filling stations have a certain impact on the environment, if the actual promotion effect is poor and the infrastructure utilization rate is low, it may have a negative impact on the overall environmental benefits of the LNG project.…”
Section: Inventory Analysis and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The promotion of LNG requires supporting facilities, the most important is LNG filling station. However, the actual promotion effect will be restricted by many factors, such as social and economic factors [11 , 13] . Since the construction and operation of filling stations have a certain impact on the environment, if the actual promotion effect is poor and the infrastructure utilization rate is low, it may have a negative impact on the overall environmental benefits of the LNG project.…”
Section: Inventory Analysis and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the utilization rate of filling stations will bring some uncertainty to the environmental benefits of LNG. A standard small and medium-sized LNG filling station covers an area of 2000 m 2 and is equipped with an LNG storage tank of 30 m 3 [11 , 13] . The Ecoinvent database “Natural gas service station {RoW}| construction | APOS, U” is used for modeling.…”
Section: Inventory Analysis and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LNG liquefied at a large terminal produces about 10% less emissions than diesel fuel and LNG liquefied in a small plant produces around 3% less emissions than diesel fuel [8]. Apart from reducing CO 2 emissions, SO X , NO X and particle emissions are also significantly reduced [35,36]. According to Kofod and Stephenson well to wheel GHG emissions from LNG trucks are around 19% lower than the ones from diesel truck and by using bio-LNG it's possible to reduce GHG emissions up to 67% [37,38].…”
Section: Ecological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of LNG refueling stations is increasing in many countries. The number of refueling stations in the US and China rose by 3% and 32%, respectively, in the years from 2010 to 2015 [89]. Supplying LNG through LNG tankers is more economical than on-site liquefaction.…”
Section: Types Of Refueling Stationmentioning
confidence: 99%