2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of JPRAS' contribution to undergraduate surgical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing fictional and nonfictional television programs and media exposure of esthetic interventions has created the impression that esthetic surgery is the dominant component of this specialty, as highlighted in a study[ 3 ] that showed that 89% of articles published in United Kingdom newspapers adopted “plastic surgery” in the context of “cosmetic surgery,” with only 10% referring to “reconstructive procedures.” Thus, as recent survey[ 2 ] demonstrate that medical students acquire their knowledge about the role of plastic surgeons primarily from the media/television, these misperceptions[ 1 2 ] of plastic surgeons as esthetic specialists can overshadow the role of plastic surgeons in fields as craniofacial surgery, hand surgery, pediatric plastic surgery, burn surgery, among other. [ 1 3 ] In addition, the lack of educational opportunities and direct clinic exposure to plastic surgery in undergraduate curricula (the proportion of medical schools teaching plastic surgery in their undergraduate curriculum has declined from 78% in 1986 to 13% in 2008, and many of the plastic surgery topics are being taught under other overlapping specialties within the undergraduate curriculum)[ 4 5 6 ] is another important reason for medical students misunderstand the work of plastic surgeons. [ 1 2 ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The increasing fictional and nonfictional television programs and media exposure of esthetic interventions has created the impression that esthetic surgery is the dominant component of this specialty, as highlighted in a study[ 3 ] that showed that 89% of articles published in United Kingdom newspapers adopted “plastic surgery” in the context of “cosmetic surgery,” with only 10% referring to “reconstructive procedures.” Thus, as recent survey[ 2 ] demonstrate that medical students acquire their knowledge about the role of plastic surgeons primarily from the media/television, these misperceptions[ 1 2 ] of plastic surgeons as esthetic specialists can overshadow the role of plastic surgeons in fields as craniofacial surgery, hand surgery, pediatric plastic surgery, burn surgery, among other. [ 1 3 ] In addition, the lack of educational opportunities and direct clinic exposure to plastic surgery in undergraduate curricula (the proportion of medical schools teaching plastic surgery in their undergraduate curriculum has declined from 78% in 1986 to 13% in 2008, and many of the plastic surgery topics are being taught under other overlapping specialties within the undergraduate curriculum)[ 4 5 6 ] is another important reason for medical students misunderstand the work of plastic surgeons. [ 1 2 ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of knowledge about the scope of plastic surgeons’ practice[ 1 2 ] and limited plastic surgery exposure during medical school[ 4 5 6 ] demands urgent undergraduate educational measures to be established. As this education should occur at individual, regional, national, and global levels, all Plastic Surgery Societies, plastic surgeons, and medical educators should actively participate in the teaching and learning process of medical students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations