2017
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci7060058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies

Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive electrophysiological methods, which record electric potentials and magnetic fields due to electric currents in synchronously-active neurons. With MEG being more sensitive to neural activity from tangential currents and EEG being able to detect both radial and tangential sources, the two methods are complementary. Over the years, neurophysiological studies have changed considerably: high-density recordings are becoming de rigueur; th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With this volume conduction issue in mind, sensor level data have not been demonstrated here. Despite the above, combining the two datasets prior to beamforming was not favored due to associated issues described in the literature 66 and our interest in modality dependent changes. No connectivity analyses were performed to investigate network changes under anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this volume conduction issue in mind, sensor level data have not been demonstrated here. Despite the above, combining the two datasets prior to beamforming was not favored due to associated issues described in the literature 66 and our interest in modality dependent changes. No connectivity analyses were performed to investigate network changes under anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as in previous studies, 19,23 we recorded more EEG than MEG ripples. This may be attributed to the higher proximity of EEG sensors to the sources compared to MEG (especially in children when adult MEG systems are used), but also by the different sensitivity profiles of EEG and MEG: 50,51 MEG is blind to radial sources and less sensitive to deep sources, but more sensitive to environmental noise than HD-EEG.…”
Section: Scalp Hd-eeg and Meg Localize Precisely The Ripple Cortical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the methodology , the ill-posed nature of the underlying inverse problem remains (from a mathematical point of view, recognition of true generators is impossible). This issue calls for highly informed data to be confronted to models, as can be achieved with the integration of EEG and MEG signals proposed more than 30 years ago (Puce and Hamalainen, 2017). This paper addresses the added value of combining EEG and MEG data for distributed source localization, which we evaluated here empirically with auditory mismatch responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%