2002
DOI: 10.1076/call.15.4.329.8270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Intelligent CALL Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Levy [20] defined CALL as the use of computers in language teaching and learning. It can also be broadly defined as the application of any media, computational method, or technique in language acquisition [21].…”
Section: Computer-assisted Language Learning (Call)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levy [20] defined CALL as the use of computers in language teaching and learning. It can also be broadly defined as the application of any media, computational method, or technique in language acquisition [21].…”
Section: Computer-assisted Language Learning (Call)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of hundreds of studies of L1 and L2 CALL systems showed consistent positive benefits for CALL systems focusing on L1 reading, writing and spelling; there was no such finding for L2 systems [13]. These and other studies suggest that CALL aids have the potential to augment traditional teaching techniques and even replace them in certain controlled circumstances [14]. The dramatic increase in processing power, low cost of computer equipment and software, as well as the fact that learners can be easily motivated to use computers, make this type of solution extremely attractive for teachers of languages.…”
Section: Computer Assisted Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the inclusion of some aspects of Artificial Intelligence was first seen as viable less than two decades ago (see [14], for a review of the evolution of Intelligent CALL). Since then a variety of systems have been proposed and implemented, with some being converted into commercially available software.…”
Section: Computer-based Tutoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem relates to the fact that future instructional programs may no longer fit well-defined categories of types of programs like tutorials, simulations, etc., and, thus, may not be evaluated by simply using different sets of criteria that match different instructional goals" (p. 17). This difficulty in classifying advanced computerassisted language learning (CALL) programs was also noted by Gamper & Knapp (2002), who predicted that future CALL programs will take a comprehensive approach that support semantics, pragmatics, cultural knowledge and social abilities.…”
Section: Common Deficiencies In Appraisal Guidelines and Checklistsmentioning
confidence: 99%