2006
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.101881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of indicators of wetland health and function in Alberta's prairie, aspen parkland and boreal dry mixedwood regions

Abstract: While there are little data available in the three regions of Alberta, based on our review of the broader literature, we expect that a useful initial approach would focus on determining an index of biotic integrity (IBI) using macrophytic vegetation (abundance and diversity), macroinvertebrates, and nutrients in marshes, the dominant wetland class in much of the white zone of Alberta. A Review of indicators of wetland health and function in Alberta's prairie, aspen parkland and boreal iii dry mixed wood regions Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there has not been a characterization of the potholes' size in the Canadian prairie region, and their physiological characteristics can vary significantly [31]. To get an idea of the spatial and temporal frequency required for water mapping, a time series analysis was conducted in our study area in Alberta.…”
Section: Water Extents Dynamics Of Prairie Potholesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there has not been a characterization of the potholes' size in the Canadian prairie region, and their physiological characteristics can vary significantly [31]. To get an idea of the spatial and temporal frequency required for water mapping, a time series analysis was conducted in our study area in Alberta.…”
Section: Water Extents Dynamics Of Prairie Potholesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Therefore, combining riparian compensation with existing marsh habitat or incorporating riparian and marsh compensation projects together may improve the quality and functioning of both habitats.…”
Section: B Improve Integration Between Aquatic and Terrestrial Envirmentioning
confidence: 99%