2014
DOI: 10.3390/s141120078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Imaging Techniques for Plant Phenotyping

Abstract: Given the rapid development of plant genomic technologies, a lack of access to plant phenotyping capabilities limits our ability to dissect the genetics of quantitative traits. Effective, high-throughput phenotyping platforms have recently been developed to solve this problem. In high-throughput phenotyping platforms, a variety of imaging methodologies are being used to collect data for quantitative studies of complex traits related to the growth, yield and adaptation to biotic or abiotic stress (disease, inse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
598
0
19

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 842 publications
(666 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
2
598
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…The diversity of crop species and the variety of traits of interest have resulted in the development of a number of different platforms for plant phenotyping (Cobb et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014). Commercial platforms, including the Scanalyzer series from Lemnatec (http:// www.lemnatec.com/products/; accessed February 2016) and the Traitmill platform from CropDesign (http:// www.cropdesign.com/general.php; accessed February 2016), have gained adoption in the research community and have promoted the development of additional software (beyond that which the respective companies provide) to analyze the images produced by the platform (Reuzeau, 2007;Hartmann et al, 2011;Fahlgren et al, 2015a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity of crop species and the variety of traits of interest have resulted in the development of a number of different platforms for plant phenotyping (Cobb et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014). Commercial platforms, including the Scanalyzer series from Lemnatec (http:// www.lemnatec.com/products/; accessed February 2016) and the Traitmill platform from CropDesign (http:// www.cropdesign.com/general.php; accessed February 2016), have gained adoption in the research community and have promoted the development of additional software (beyond that which the respective companies provide) to analyze the images produced by the platform (Reuzeau, 2007;Hartmann et al, 2011;Fahlgren et al, 2015a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already, there is considerable experimentation with large, tractor-based platforms that carry a set of sensors; traditional remote sensing; and aerial vehicles [6,15,30,31]. Robots offer a wider range of imaging frequencies and techniques, opening new algorithmic possibilities [15,32].…”
Section: Constraints On Image Collection and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, plant phenotyping applications for indoor field such as plant factory and greenhouse have been developed using current technologies of sensor devices and image analysis (Hartmann et al, 2011;Constantino et al, 2015). On the other hand, plant phenotyping for outdoor field, which is laborious, time-consuming and often destructive when manually methods are used, applications are still under development (Araus and Cairns, 2014;Friedli et al, 2016;Schima et al, 2016), and less-laborious and -time-consuming, and non-destructive phenotyping methods are required and need to be developed (Li et al, 2014;Minervini et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%