2014
DOI: 10.15302/j-fase-2014041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of hydrological/water-quality models

Abstract: Water quality models are important in predicting the changes in surface water quality for environmental management. A range of water quality models are wildly used, but every model has its advantages and limitations for specific situations. The aim of this review is to provide a guide to researcher for selecting a suitable water quality model. Eight well known water quality models were selected for this review: SWAT, WASP, QUALs, MIKE 11, HSPF, CE-QUAL-W2, ELCOM-CAEDYM and EFDC. Each model is described accordi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The early Streeter and Phelps models date to 1925 and were used to develop pollution control strategies in rivers (Wang, Li, Jia, Qi, & Ding, ). These were 1D, steady‐state models used to simulate relationships between pollutants and dissolved oxygen and sediment oxygen demand (Gao & Li, ). With the advancement in computational resources, the 1D models have expanded to 2D and 3D models and include the capacity to simulate other elements (e.g., nutrients and organic chemicals) and effects on biota (e.g., algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals; Park, Clough, & Wellman, ; Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The early Streeter and Phelps models date to 1925 and were used to develop pollution control strategies in rivers (Wang, Li, Jia, Qi, & Ding, ). These were 1D, steady‐state models used to simulate relationships between pollutants and dissolved oxygen and sediment oxygen demand (Gao & Li, ). With the advancement in computational resources, the 1D models have expanded to 2D and 3D models and include the capacity to simulate other elements (e.g., nutrients and organic chemicals) and effects on biota (e.g., algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals; Park, Clough, & Wellman, ; Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early Streeter and Phelps models date to 1925 and were used to develop pollution control strategies in rivers (Wang, Li, Jia, Qi, & Ding, 2013). These were 1D, steady-state models used to simulate relationships between pollutants and dissolved oxygen and sediment oxygen demand (Gao & Li, 2014 reviewed simulated the transport and levels of a range of determinates across the study area (Table A6). For example, nutrients (e.g., nitrates, ammonia, and phosphorus), oxygen (e.g., dissolved oxygen and biological oxygen demand), water temperature, primary productivity (especially chlorophyll a), and dissolved and suspended sediments were modelled for a range of environments.…”
Section: Water Quality Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on seasonality of quality parameters of lake waters has not been presented, as it is irrelevant for this approach. Case study papers, assessing spatial distribution of parameters or modeling approach, often lack seasonal perspective [23][24][25]. This paper focuses on the impact of Lake Bikcze's confluence (inflow-outflow transect) on DO, pH, and chlorophyll-a distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water quantity and quality modelling using catchment scale, dynamic models has become very popular during past two decades [GAO, LI 2014]. One of the most popular models is Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) which was applied in Europe across a range of spatial scales: from the whole continent , to largest river basins [ČERKASOVA et al 2016;PAGLIERO et al 2014;PI-NIEWSKI et al 2016], meso-scale catchments [OSTOJ-SKI et al 2014;PINIEWSKI et al 2015] and small catchments [BRZOZOWSKI et al 2011;MARCINKOW-SKI et al 2013;MOLINA-NAVARRO et al 2014; SMA-RZYŃSKA, MIATKOWSKI 2016;ŚMIETANKA 2014].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%