2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/vis47514.2020.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Geospatial Content in IEEE Visualization Publications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature-based Visualization in Meteorology Our driving science domain in this study is meteorology. Meteorological applications have frequently motivated work on visualization in recent years, overviews were provided by Rautenhaus et al [52], Azfal et al [1] and Yohizumi et al [70]. Different aspects of visualization in meteorology have been addressed, including feature-based visualization, flow visualization and 3D interactive visual analysis techniques, all relevant to the techniques discussed in our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature-based Visualization in Meteorology Our driving science domain in this study is meteorology. Meteorological applications have frequently motivated work on visualization in recent years, overviews were provided by Rautenhaus et al [52], Azfal et al [1] and Yohizumi et al [70]. Different aspects of visualization in meteorology have been addressed, including feature-based visualization, flow visualization and 3D interactive visual analysis techniques, all relevant to the techniques discussed in our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of geospatial content by Yoshizumi et al (2020) indicates that there were 94 of 220 papers in recent IEEE VIS publications used geospatial data. A variety of VA methods and tools have been developed to visually make sense of geospatial data (Andrienko et al 2016).…”
Section: Visual Exploration Of Spatiotemporal Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization approaches for meteorological analysis have been discussed widely in the literature. Comprehensive overviews have been provided by Rautenhaus et al (2018); Afzal et al (2019); Yoshizumi et al (2020). Our workflow builds upon and extends approaches to perform interactive statistical data analysis (Love et al, 2005;Potter et al, 2010;Orf et al, 2016;Meyer et al, 2021), and touches on aspects of 3-D feature-based visualization (Rautenhaus et al, 2015a;Kern et al, 2018Kern et al, , 2019Bader et al, 2019;Kappe et al, 2022;Bösiger et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%