A review of geoanalytical databases

He, Yutong; Bai, Yang; Tian, Di; Li, Yao; Fan, Runlong; Chen, Pengfei

doi:10.1007/s11631-019-00323-3

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2018, He et al . 2019). This lack of data accessibility and transparency impedes regional Big Data syntheses and hinders inter‐laboratory analytical comparisons from being easily performed.…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These geochemical, geochronological and thermochronological information, often complemented by petrological and crystallographic observations acquired through a range of microscopy techniques, allow geochemists to address fundamental questions about the formation, composition, interaction and evolution of planetary bodies, namely Earth, as well as provide critical information needed for the discovery and utilisation of geological resources. and geoscientists across the globe, a large proportion of geochemical data remain inaccessible to the public (e.g., Federer et al 2018, He et al 2019. This lack of data accessibility and transparency impedes regional Big Data syntheses and hinders inter-laboratory analytical comparisons from being easily performed.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The wide variability in Earth Science data formats and models, their inherent multi-dimensionality (x, y, z, chemistry, petrology, time, temperature and pressure) and the complexity of big data processing necessitate the development of tailored analytical techniques and tools for FAIR geochemical data distribution (Baumann et al 2016). To facilitate the accessibility, systematic collation, assessment and processing of geochemical and geochronological data acquired from geological specimens, numerous structured databases have been developed globally (He et al 2019). They range from rock databases (e.g., NAVDAT, Walker et al 2004, Walker et al 2006, to geochemical surveys (e.g., China National Multi-Purpose Geochemical DB, Liu et al 2012), archives of geochronology and isotope data (e.g., DataView, Eglington 2004) and reference materials (GeoReM, Jochum et al 2005), varying in scope from national (e.g., Petlab, Strong et al 2016) to global scales (e.g., EarthChem, Lehnert et al 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a straw poll of leading geochemists across Australia at the 2018 TANG3O (Thermochronology and Noble Gas Geochronology and Geochemistry Organisation) Meeting, it was estimated that a mere ~5-10% of geochemistry data produced in Australian laboratories ever reaches the public domain. Even then, only approximately one-fifth of published papers make the supporting data publicly available via data repositories (Federer et al 2018), and often without the detailed (meta-)data required for robust data integration and interpretation (He et al 2019). This lack of data transparency stems, at least in part, from the fact that the scientific contribution of those that generate data, including funding bodies, sample collectors, lab technicians and dataset collators, is rarely recognised (Pierce et al 2019).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

AusGeochem: An Open Platform for Geochemical Data Preservation, Dissemination and Synthesis

Boone

Dalton

Prent

et al. 2022

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To promote a more efficient and transparent geochemistry data ecosystem, a consortium of Australian university research laboratories called the AuScope Geochemistry Network assembled to build a collaborative platform for the express purpose of preserving, disseminating and collating geochronology and isotopic data. In partnership with geoscience‐data‐solutions company Lithodat Pty Ltd, the open, cloud‐based AusGeochem platform (https://ausgeochem.auscope.org.au) was developed to simultaneously serve as a geosample registry, a geochemical data repository and a data analysis tool. Informed by method‐specific groups of geochemistry experts and established international data reporting practices, community‐agreed database schemas were developed for rock and mineral geosample metadata and secondary ion mass spectrometry U‐Pb analysis, with additional models for laser ablation‐inductively coupled‐mass spectrometry U‐Pb and Lu‐Hf, Ar‐Ar, fission‐track and (U‐Th‐Sm)/He under development. Collectively, the AusGeochem platform provides the geochemistry community with a new, dynamic resource to help facilitate FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data management, streamline data dissemination and advanced quantitative investigations of Earth system processes. By systematically archiving detailed geochemical (meta‐)data in structured schemas, intractably large datasets comprising thousands of analyses produced by numerous laboratories can be readily interrogated in novel and powerful ways. These include rapid derivation of inter‐data relationships, facilitating on‐the‐fly data compilation, analysis and visualisation.

show abstract

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

AusGeochem: An Open Platform for Geochemical Data Preservation, Dissemination and Synthesis

Boone

Dalton

Prent

et al. 2022

Geostandard Geoanalytic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…First, progress has been made through journals and organizations adopting stringent data archiving rules and promoting adherence to FAIR principles-findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability ("FAIR Play in Geoscience Data," 2019; Wilkinson et al, 2016). Second, several databases now house geochemical data at different scales and with different focuses (Brantley et al, 2020;Gard et al, 2019;He et al, 2019;Lehnert et al, 2000).…”

Section: Why Sg P?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Sedimentary Geochemistry and Paleoenvironments Project

Farrell

Samawi

Anjanappa³

et al. 2021

Geobiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geobiology explores how Earth's system has changed over the course of geologic history and how living organisms on this planet are impacted by or are indeed causing these changes. For decades, geologists, paleontologists, and geochemists have generated data to investigate these topics. Foundational efforts in sedimentaryThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

show abstract

Applications of artificial intelligence in geothermal resource exploration: A review

AlGaiar,

Hossain,

Petrovski

et al. 2024

Deep Underground Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly important in geothermal exploration, significantly improving the efficiency of resource identification. This review examines current AI applications, focusing on the algorithms used, the challenges addressed, and the opportunities created. In addition, the review highlights the growth of machine learning applications in geothermal exploration over the past decade, demonstrating how AI has improved the analysis of subsurface data to identify potential resources. AI techniques such as neural networks, support vector machines, and decision trees are used to estimate subsurface temperatures, predict rock and fluid properties, and identify optimal drilling locations. In particular, neural networks are the most widely used technique, further contributing to improved exploration efficiency. However, the widespread adoption of AI in geothermal exploration is hindered by challenges, such as data accessibility, data quality, and the need for tailored data science training for industry professionals. Furthermore, the review emphasizes the importance of data engineering methodologies, data scaling, and standardization to enable the development of accurate and generalizable AI models for geothermal exploration. It is concluded that the integration of AI into geothermal exploration holds great promise for accelerating the development of geothermal energy resources. By effectively addressing key challenges and leveraging AI technologies, the geothermal industry can unlock cost‐effective and sustainable power generation opportunities.

show abstract

A review of geoanalytical databases

Cited by 3 publications

References 44 publications

AusGeochem: An Open Platform for Geochemical Data Preservation, Dissemination and Synthesis

AusGeochem: An Open Platform for Geochemical Data Preservation, Dissemination and Synthesis

The Sedimentary Geochemistry and Paleoenvironments Project

Applications of artificial intelligence in geothermal resource exploration: A review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About