A review of foot-and-mouth disease with special consideration for the clinical and epidemiological factors relevant to predictive modelling of the disease

Kitching, R.; Hutber, Adrian; Thrusfield, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.06.001

Cited by 114 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinical signs (acute fever, anorexia, vesicular lesions in the mouth and feet of infected animals with consequent excessive salivation, lameness and reduced productivity) determined in this study were in agreement with those reported for FMD [6,[11][12][13] .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…However, even in some breeds of cattle, FMD can also be clinically difficult to recognize because of the mild appearance of the disease [10] . The disease is typically characterized by acute fever and the development of vesicular lesions in the mouth and feet of infected cloven-hoofed animals (principally cattle, pigs, sheep and goats) with consequent excessive salivation, anorexia, lameness, mortality of young animals and reduced productivity [10][11][12][13] . Foot-and-mouth disease usually has a high morbidity and low mortality, with mortality occurring mostly in young animals [6] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Şap Hastalıklı Boğalarda Serum ve Salya Sialik Asit ve Oksidatif Stres Parametrelerindeki Değişiklikler

Uzlu¹,

Karapehlivan²,

Erdoğan³

et al. 2016

Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study comprised of 12 bulls, aged between 18-36 months, determined severe symptoms of Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and 10 clinically healthy bulls of similar age. Serum and saliva total sialic acid (SA), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH) and nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured. In this study were determined acute fever, anorexia, vesicular lesions in the mouth and feet of infected animals with consequent excessive salivation, lameness and reduced productivity as clinical signs. Mean serum SA, MDA, GSH and NO levels were 503.96±21.43 mg/L, 31.82±3.43 µmol/L, 63.43±2.92 mg/dL, and 6.49±0.36 nmol/L in healthy bulls and 862.01±17.35 mg/L, 82.49±9.90 µmol/L, 24.96±2.32 mg/dL, and 13.89±0.53 nmol/L in FMD cases, respectively. Mean saliva SA, MDA, GSH and NO levels were 75.98±10.25 mg/L, 1.06±0.17 µmol/L, 0.67±0.05 mg/dL, and 1.44±0.14 nmol/L in healthy bulls and 156.49±14.07 mg/L, 1.81±0.15 µmol/L, 0.34±0.03 mg/dL, and 2.44±0.16 nmol/L in FMD cases, respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.001 and P<0.01). Mean serum and saliva GSH level was lower in FMD while all other parameters were considerable high. As a result, showing signs of foot and mouth disease in bulls, serum and saliva in sialic acid and oxidative stress parameters are affected very significantly.Keywords: Bull, Malondialdehyde, Foot-and-mouth

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Şap Hastalıklı Boğalarda Serum ve Salya Sialik Asit ve Oksidatif Stres Parametrelerindeki Değişiklikler

Uzlu¹,

Karapehlivan²,

Erdoğan³

et al. 2016

Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In other way, it clearly depicts that the virus is inter-transmissible between species; however, the direction of infection / transmission dynamics could not be conclusively traced out. Though pigs are highly susceptible to FMD, they do not become carriers (Kitching et al, 2005;Lubroth et al, 2006;Stenfeldt et al, 2016). However, an infected pig being powerful emitter of airborne FMDV can liberate up to 10 8.6 TCID 50 of virus (about 3000 times as much as cattle) during a 24 hour period Donaldson, 1999;Geering and Lubroth, 2002).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various other modes of virus transmission have also been documented in pigs. Recent examples include an outbreak in a South African pig farm in 2000 due to swill feeding (Sutmoller et al, 2003;Kitching et al, 2005); spread of FMD during the 2001 UK outbreak involving a swill-fed pig unit (Sutmoller et al, 2003;Kitching et al, 2005;Paton et al, 2009); feeding of contraband abattoir offal to pigs reared in close proximity to cattle causing the outbreak in Uruguay (Sutmoller et al, 2003); imported straw assumed to be the source of FMD in Korea in 2000 (Shin et al, 2003) and in Japan in 2000 (Sugiura et al, 2001). However, in the present case, most of the workers in the pig farm residing in the nearby villages reared their own cattle.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of foot-and mouth disease outbreak in a pig farm at Kollam district of Kerala, India

Rout

Subramaniam

Mohapatra

et al. 2017

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present paper describes the investigation of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in a private pig farm at Kotty in Kollam district of Kerala during October 2013. During the clinical phase, severe vesicular lesions on snout and skin around the coronary bands were observed in pigs. A total of 48 serum samples and 12 clinical samples (ruptured snout epithelia) were collected. All serum samples were subjected to indirect 3AB nonstructural protein (NSP) ELISA and liquid phase blocking (LPB) ELISA. In 3AB NSP ELISA, all serum samples were found positive for NSP antibodies indicating infection. In LPB ELISA, 42 of 48 (87.5%) pigs were found to have protective log 10 antibody titre of 1.8 against FMD virus serotypes O, A and Asia 1. All the clinical materials were found positive for serotype O in antigen detection ELISA as well as in multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (mRT-PCR). In VP1 region-based phylogenetic analysis, the serotype O isolates causing the outbreak were found to conglomerate within Ind2001 lineage. Pigs infected with FMD may pose rigorous threat to other susceptible domestic livestock as they exhale enormous quantity of virus. As a consequence, they should be included under prophylactic vaccination and surveillance programmes ongoing in the country.

show abstract

“…The disease affects cattle, swine, sheep, goats and other cloven-hoofed ruminants. Furthermore, elephant, and giraffe are susceptible to FMD (Kitching, 2005). Bovine ephemeral fever (BEF) is a non-contagious arthropod-borne disease of cattle and water buffaloes caused by the bovine ephemeral fever virus (Nandi and Negi, 1999).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on prevalence of bovine diseases at sadar upazila in dinajpur district of Bangladesh

Mohammed

Rahman

Hoque

et al. 2018

Asian J. Med. Biol. Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The study was conducted to investigate the status of cattle diseases with relation to seasonal variation in Dinajpur district of Bangladesh. A total of 11402 clinical cases were registered for the clinical diagnosis and therapeutic purposes at sadar upazila veterinary hospital in Dinajpur district of Bangladesh during the period of March, 2016 to February, 2017. Disease diagnosis was made on the basis of owner's statement, general examination and clinical signs. Diagnosed diseases were categorized as general clinical disorders, parasitic diseases, viral diseases, bacterial diseases, venereal disease, and metabolic disorders. According to study the highest (64.15%) prevalence was by parasitic disease followed by bacterial diseases (10.67%), viral diseases (8.97%), metabolic disease (7.61%), and venereal disease (6.60%). In respect of seasons, the prevalence of both bacterial diseases and viral diseases were significantly (p<0.01) higher (13.88%) and (12.10%) in summer season respectively. Whereas the parasitic diseases were significantly (p<0.01) higher (68.65%) in winter season. On the basis of season, it was found that the overall prevalence of diseases was highest in summer season (47.87%) followed by rainy season (30.10%) and comparatively lower in winter season (22.03%).

show abstract

A review of foot-and-mouth disease with special consideration for the clinical and epidemiological factors relevant to predictive modelling of the disease

Cited by 114 publications

References 36 publications

Şap Hastalıklı Boğalarda Serum ve Salya Sialik Asit ve Oksidatif Stres Parametrelerindeki Değişiklikler

Şap Hastalıklı Boğalarda Serum ve Salya Sialik Asit ve Oksidatif Stres Parametrelerindeki Değişiklikler

Investigation of foot-and mouth disease outbreak in a pig farm at Kollam district of Kerala, India

Study on prevalence of bovine diseases at sadar upazila in dinajpur district of Bangladesh

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About