2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of factors affecting filter cake properties in dead-end microfiltration of microbial suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the membrane fouling has been studied and mathematically modelled in classic filtration regimes (crossflow and dead-end) (e.g. Foley, 2006), the effect of turbulence induced by gas sparging in iMBR systems is still being assessed (Drews, 2010). As is well known, it has a clear contribution to minimizing the fouling problem, and therefore, a deeper understanding is extremely important in order to optimise aeration mode and rate, which has been proved to be one of its major operational costs.…”
Section: Advantages and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the membrane fouling has been studied and mathematically modelled in classic filtration regimes (crossflow and dead-end) (e.g. Foley, 2006), the effect of turbulence induced by gas sparging in iMBR systems is still being assessed (Drews, 2010). As is well known, it has a clear contribution to minimizing the fouling problem, and therefore, a deeper understanding is extremely important in order to optimise aeration mode and rate, which has been proved to be one of its major operational costs.…”
Section: Advantages and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, when a beverage is filtered through a porous membrane, solid particles accumulates on the filter as a cake, whereas the fluid being filtered with a flow rate inversely proportional to the filter resistance (Foley, 2006;Mahdi & Holdich, 2013). This filter resistance increases with the formation of cells cake on the filter media with different morphologies in the filtration process (Ben Hassan, Lafforgue, Ayadi, & Schmitz, 2014;Mahdi & Holdich, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane fouling by food wastewater filtration is attributed to depositation of species from effluents onto the membrane surface or within membrane porous, it causes a permeate flux decline with time because the filtration resistance is significant increased (Foley, 2006). Fouling studies on membranes are based in proteins depositation and their interaction in membranes surface.…”
Section: Membrane Fouling Control In Food Industry For Wastewater Trementioning
confidence: 99%