A review of experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms

Abstract

Experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms are reviewed. Effective diffusive permeabilities, the parameter appropriate to the analysis of reaction‐diffusion interactions, depend on solute type and biofilm density. Three categories of solute physical chemistry with distinct diffusive properties were distinguished by the present analysis. In order of descending mean relative effective diffusive permeability (De/Daq) these were inorganic anions or cations (0.56), nonpolar solutes with molecular weights of 44 or less (0.43), and organic solutes of molecular weight greater than 44 (0.29). Effective diffusive permeabilities decrease sharply with increasing biomass volume fraction suggesting a serial resistance model of diffusion in biofilms as proposed by Hinson and Kocher (1996). A conceptual model of biofilm structure is proposed in which each cell is surrounded by a restricted permeability envelope. Effective diffusion coefficients, which are appropriate to the analysis of transient penetration of nonreactive solutes, are generally similar to effective diffusive permeabilities in biofilms of similar composition. In three studies that examine diffusion of very large molecular weight solutes ( > 5000) in biofilms, the average ratio of the relative effective diffusion coefficient of the large solute to the relative effective diffusion coefficient of either sucrose or fluorescein was 0.64, 0.61, and 0.36. It is proposed that large solutes are effectively excluded from microbial cells, that small solutes partition into and diffuse within cells, and that ionic solutes are excluded from cells but exhibit increased diffusive permeability (but decreased effective diffusion coefficients) due to sorption to the biofilm matrix. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:261–272, 1998.

Antibiotic-tolerant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Persists on Arthroplasty Materials

“…This suggests that the glycocalyx was not inhibiting diffusion of the antibiotic to the point of providing protection at the base of the biofilm. These results correlate with other models that demonstrate limited restriction in solubilized molecules [24,28].…”

Direct measurement of diffusivity within diatom aggregates containing transparent exopolymer particles

“…The high value of diffusivity of small molecules reported here compares well with values obtained for small as well as large molecules in biofilms with low biomass (cells and TEP) volume fractions (Libicki et al 1988;Stewart 1998). Our measurements also confirm previous studies where fine-scale oxygen gradients measured within aggregates could be modeled assuming a diffusion coefficient of oxygen .90% of the free diffusion coefficient in seawater (Ploug et al 1997).…”

Byproduct Cross Feeding and Community Stability in an In Silico Biofilm Model of the Gut Microbiome

“…The presence of spatial heterogeneity within biofilms plays an essential role in the evolution and function of microbial species [2,[6][7][8][9] and has profound effects on biofilm formation and development [5,[10][11][12]. Concentration gradients in key nutrients due to limited diffusion can establish metabolic niches within the biofilm which produce spatial variations in biomass density [13] and partitioning of species [14]. With their inherent chemical gradients, biofilms can provide niches for both fast and slow growing organisms, a design feature thought to be critical to the stability of naturally occurring systems.…”