2013 IEEE 25th International Conference on Tools With Artificial Intelligence 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ictai.2013.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Ensemble Classification for DNA Microarrays Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imbalanced data and the small number of samples are other problems of microarray data that challenge the performance of classification models in training and coping with unseen data. One method to cope with such challenges is to use ensemble learning models, which is in good agreement with many studies that have utilized these methods on the microarray datasets [44][45][46][47]. The aim of developing such a system is to offer a trade-off solution between test error and training error in an automated classification model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Imbalanced data and the small number of samples are other problems of microarray data that challenge the performance of classification models in training and coping with unseen data. One method to cope with such challenges is to use ensemble learning models, which is in good agreement with many studies that have utilized these methods on the microarray datasets [44][45][46][47]. The aim of developing such a system is to offer a trade-off solution between test error and training error in an automated classification model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The choice of the RF algorithm for this work is due to its ability to find complicated patterns in data and improve classification with less overfitting compared to other models ( Breiman, 2001 ; Khoshgoftaar et al, 2013 ; Maurya et al, 2021 ). RFs have also been shown to be robust to noise and perform better on imbalanced data sets ( Breiman, 2001 ; Khoshgoftaar et al, 2007 ; Khoshgoftaar et al, 2013 ). Even when including highly imbalanced cohorts, the RF model had better performance metrics than the published XGBoost model used to classify p53 pathway activity ( Zhang et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning refers to the development, analysis (Khoshgoftaar et al, 2013) and implementation of methods that allow a machine to evolve through a learning process, and thus to perform tasks that are difficult or impossible to perform by more conventional algorithmic means.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%