2019
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of early warning systems for prompt detection of patients at risk for clinical decline

Abstract: Early Warning Scores (EWS) are a composite evaluation of a patient's basic physiology, changes of which are the first indicators of clinical decline and are used to prompt further patient assessment and when indicated intervention. These are sometimes referred to as “track and triggers systems” with tracking meant to denote periodic observation of physiology and trigger being a predetermined response criteria. This review article examines the most widely used EWS, with special attention paid to those used in m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
34
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified Early Warning Score consists of 5 physiological parameters, which include systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and level of consciousness. It has been used as an essential tool for early identification of patients who can deteriorate in medical and surgical wards (Fullerton et al, 2012;Kramer, Sebat & Lissauer, 2019;Salottolo et al, 2017). Some studies have shown that a MEWS score of 5 or above is associated with a high risk of poor outcome in intensive care unit (Reini, Fredrikson & Oscarsson, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified Early Warning Score consists of 5 physiological parameters, which include systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and level of consciousness. It has been used as an essential tool for early identification of patients who can deteriorate in medical and surgical wards (Fullerton et al, 2012;Kramer, Sebat & Lissauer, 2019;Salottolo et al, 2017). Some studies have shown that a MEWS score of 5 or above is associated with a high risk of poor outcome in intensive care unit (Reini, Fredrikson & Oscarsson, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current recommendations of the Royal College of Physicians of London [6] set thresholds and triggers. An aggregate score of 7 or more indicates high risk that demands the response of the critical care team [36]. With this strict criterion for activating the emergency response, health systems ensure that no ill person is at risk of mortality and of suffering SAEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works analyzing the use of EWS in a prehospital setting are numerous [14,15,30,31] and more specifically concern the use of EWS in patients with trauma [32][33][34][35]. Studies that specifically analyse scores to predict the risk of deterioration in TBI are scarce.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regular assessment of the risk of deterioration through EWS is a standard procedure in multiple clinical context the use of which is more than contrasted [14,15,28] and which can help to detect patients with TBI and a high risk [49,50]. Determining which patients may be subsidiaries of advanced procedures and rapid transportation to a useful center must be a priority for the EMS [51].…”
Section: Early Warning Scores (Ews) and Prehospital Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation