2018
DOI: 10.1214/18-ss121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of dynamic network models with latent variables

Abstract: We present a selective review of statistical modeling of dynamic networks. We focus on models with latent variables, specifically, the latent space models and the latent class models (or stochastic blockmodels), which investigate both the observed features and the unobserved structure of networks. We begin with an overview of the static models, and then we introduce the dynamic extensions. For each dynamic model, we also discuss its applications that have been studied in the literature, with the data source li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensions to the model with link persistence, where connections/disconnections can also be copied from the previous to the next snapshot [49,50], would allow additional control over the rate of dynamics, i.e., on how fast the topology changes from snapshot to snapshot. The dynamic-S 1 or extensions of it may apply to other types of timevarying networks, such as the ones considered in [51,52], and constitute the basis of maximum likelihood estimation methods that infer the node coordinates and their evolution in the latent spaces of real systems [53]. Taken altogether, our results pave the way towards generative modeling of temporal networks that simultaneously satisfies simplicity, realism, and mathematical tractability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Extensions to the model with link persistence, where connections/disconnections can also be copied from the previous to the next snapshot [49,50], would allow additional control over the rate of dynamics, i.e., on how fast the topology changes from snapshot to snapshot. The dynamic-S 1 or extensions of it may apply to other types of timevarying networks, such as the ones considered in [51,52], and constitute the basis of maximum likelihood estimation methods that infer the node coordinates and their evolution in the latent spaces of real systems [53]. Taken altogether, our results pave the way towards generative modeling of temporal networks that simultaneously satisfies simplicity, realism, and mathematical tractability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, this first kind of approach has been criticized because it can not fully capture the timevarying patterns of the network structure. This opens to a second stream of literature which aims to describe these patterns with models having time-varying (latent) parameters that capture how network topology changes in time, see [10] for a review. A milestone work is represented by the study of Sarkar and Moore [11] that generalized the latent space model introduced in [12] to dynamic networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various Bayesian statistical models have also been developed for dynamic network studies with state-space models (Kim et al, 2018). State-space models represent data with coupled observation (noise, natural random variation) components and latent process (underlying state variables with stochastic but sustained patterns over time).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%