The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of development of better prediction equations for blast fragmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where there are too many boulders, the mine operator will be faced with the need for secondary blasting, which will have unnecessary negative consequences for the company's cash flow. It also poses safety issues due to the increased risk of flyrock and air blast hazard because of the light stemming employed in secondary blasting (Abuhasel, 2019;Ouchterlony and Sanchidrián, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In cases where there are too many boulders, the mine operator will be faced with the need for secondary blasting, which will have unnecessary negative consequences for the company's cash flow. It also poses safety issues due to the increased risk of flyrock and air blast hazard because of the light stemming employed in secondary blasting (Abuhasel, 2019;Ouchterlony and Sanchidrián, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most recent empirical fragmentation models were introduced in 2005 and both have undergone subsequent modification to better predict the size of rock fragments and minimize the occurrence of boulders. These are the KCO (Cunningham, 2005) and Modified Kuz-Ram models (Ouchterlony and Sanchidrián, 2019), and were developed to overcome the shortcomings of the Kuz-Ram model (Ouchterlony and Sanchidrián, 2019). One of the reasons for the KCO model's superiority to the other empirical models is the fact that the required input parameters are comparatively simple to obtain and apply in fragment size prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mineral concentration, hardness, strength and toughness of the ore body is partially known in advance, from exploratory drilling, and stored in a block model [6]. These are input parameters to many models for blasting [7], crushing [8] or grinding [9], such as the Kuz-Ram blasting and JKMRC grinding models. Measurement-while-drilling (MWD) of blast holes produces data that contain information about the geo-mechanical properties at higher spatial resolution than the exploration data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finer fragmentation due to additional blast energy leads to increased throughput and creates extra value from additional revenue by relieving constraints in the plant (Kanchibotla et al 1998). Detailed comparisons of fragmentation modelling cannot be provided here and further information including comparisons with new approaches such as the distribution-free model for the prediction of fragmentation for mine-to-mill optimisation can be seen in the relevant literature (Ouchterlony & Sanchidrián 2019;Sanchidrián et al 2012Sanchidrián et al , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%