2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of deep learning-based detection methods for COVID-19

Abstract: COVID-19 is a fast-spreading pandemic, and early detection is crucial for stopping the spread of infection. Lung images are used in the detection of coronavirus infection. Chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) images are available for the detection of COVID-19. Deep learning methods have been proven efficient and better performing in many computer vision and medical imaging applications. In the rise of the COVID pandemic, researchers are using deep learning methods to detect coronavirus infection in l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For those reasons, it seems difficult to compare raw results (in terms of the TPR or the AUC, for example) between the proposed algorithm and the literature, since they do not address exactly the same problem. Moreover, when considering the false negative rate (FNR), defined as the ratio between the images not being assigned to any category (so considered as good health) and the total number of positives, we observed that for most pathologies the FNR was less than 1%, which is a good result (the cited works, by their nature and problem addressed, lead to the calculated FNRs of 1% to 3% [18,19]).…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For those reasons, it seems difficult to compare raw results (in terms of the TPR or the AUC, for example) between the proposed algorithm and the literature, since they do not address exactly the same problem. Moreover, when considering the false negative rate (FNR), defined as the ratio between the images not being assigned to any category (so considered as good health) and the total number of positives, we observed that for most pathologies the FNR was less than 1%, which is a good result (the cited works, by their nature and problem addressed, lead to the calculated FNRs of 1% to 3% [18,19]).…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To the best of our knowledge, those methods follow computer science vision but make the abstraction of main practical needs, such as data availability and conditions of use. Moreover, the literature generates good solutions to classify medical images; however, they require high computing power, which implies that these types of solutions cannot be implemented in health centers with few computing resources [18,19]. Indeed, those methods make, in general, the abstraction of computational effort limitations and assume all users can meet the settings used to deploy the proposed algorithms, in terms of both hardware and of software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work in COVID-19 detection is to extract images on patient lungs using the ultrasound technology, a technique to identify and monitor patients affected by viruses. Therefore, the development of detection and recognition techniques is needed which is capable of automating the process without needing the help of skilled specialists [111,112,113,114]. From these techniques, we can find computer vision based techniques that help in detection using images and videos.…”
Section: Covid-19 Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning and machine learning models are widely used in this context to achieve efficient and autonomous results [2] , [3] . Real-time data can be generated from computer vision systems [4] , [5] , [6] . This can support the human resources that are already present to make informed decisions, avoiding mis-interpretations and overcoming the lack of efficiency in detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%