2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of current state-of-the-art control methods for lower-limb powered prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For equation‐error autoregressive (EEAR) systems, a filtered generalized projection‐based iterative identification method, a filtered (multi‐innovation) generalized gradient‐based iterative identification method, and a filtered (multi‐innovation) generalized least squares‐based iterative identification method are proposed. Although these filtered generalized iterative identification methods are proposed for equation‐error autoregressive systems under the interference of autoregressive noises, the basic idea can be extended to linear and nonlinear stochastic systems with colored noises 112–121 . and can be applied to engineering systems 122–129 such as process control and manufacture systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For equation‐error autoregressive (EEAR) systems, a filtered generalized projection‐based iterative identification method, a filtered (multi‐innovation) generalized gradient‐based iterative identification method, and a filtered (multi‐innovation) generalized least squares‐based iterative identification method are proposed. Although these filtered generalized iterative identification methods are proposed for equation‐error autoregressive systems under the interference of autoregressive noises, the basic idea can be extended to linear and nonlinear stochastic systems with colored noises 112–121 . and can be applied to engineering systems 122–129 such as process control and manufacture systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that our visual perception system is designed to supplement, not replace, the existing intent recognition systems of robotic prosthetic legs and exoskeletons that use mechanical, inertial, and/or EMG data to estimate the current state of the human-robot-environment system [26]. We view computer vision as a means to improve the speed and accuracy of locomotion mode (intent) recognition by minimizing the search space of potential solutions based on the perceived walking environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our algorithm could include a third layer capable of handling transition state-action pairs between different locomotion modes and adding additional instances to our second layer for each mode such that each instance of the second layer is responsible for a specific locomotor task, while the third layer is responsible for task transitions. This hierarchical architecture resembles the control system design of most robotic leg prostheses and exoskeletons [1]. For example, deep learning models of vision [34][35], inertial, and/or EMG data used for high-level locomotion mode recognition could be integrated with reinforcement learning algorithms at the mid-level for end-to-end AI-powered robotic leg control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control of robotic leg prostheses and exoskeletons is an open problem and an active area of research [1], [2]. Computer simulation can be used to study the dynamics and control of human walking and extract principles that can be programmed into robotic legs to behave similar to biological legs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%