2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of current smoke constituent measurement activities and aspects of yield variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to differences in individual cigarettes, laboratory measurement variability can potentially decrease the ability to accurately predict HPHC yields when considering all commercial cigarettes on the market. 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to differences in individual cigarettes, laboratory measurement variability can potentially decrease the ability to accurately predict HPHC yields when considering all commercial cigarettes on the market. 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cells produce ROS at baseline as a result of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) reactions, the basal level of ROS resulting from residual, unreduced molecular oxygen (ϳ1-3%) during OXPHOS can increase drastically when mitochondria encounter damaging stimuli. CS is a concoction of ϳ5,000 reactive chemicals, and contains Ͼ10 15 free radicals in the gas phase and 10 18 free radicals/g in the tar phase (48,63), and includes ROS such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl anion. Accordingly, given such a high complement of exogenous reactive radicals provided by CS, it becomes important to understand the effect of CS on mitochondrial structure and function in the context of ROS and downstream effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of potential data misinterpretation due to temporal variability within one laboratory (8) and among laboratories (9) have been discussed previously. PURKIS et al reviewed the works undertaken on smoke constituent measurements and related variability, and highlighted the factors influencing this variability (10). ELDRIDGE et al also published on the variation in tobacco and mainstream smoke constituents from selected commercial cigarette products (11), and observed that coefficient of variation (CV) values averaged 20% in a single laboratory for commercial products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%