A Review of Current Research in Subscale Flight Testing and Analysis of Its Main Practical Challenges

Abstract

Testing of untethered subscale models, often referred to as subscale flight testing, has traditionally had a relatively minor, yet relevant use in aeronautical research and development. As recent advances in electronics, rapid prototyping and unmanned-vehicle technologies expand its capabilities and lower its cost, this experimental method is seeing growing interest across academia and the industry. However, subscale models cannot meet all similarity conditions required for simulating full-scale flight. This leads to a variety of approaches to scaling and to other alternative applications. Through a literature review and analysis of different scaling strategies, this study presents an overall picture of how subscale flight testing has been used in recent years and synthesises its main issues and practical limitations. Results show that, while the estimation of full-scale characteristics is still an interesting application within certain flight conditions, subscale models are progressively taking a broader role as low-cost technology-testing platforms with relaxed similarity constraints. Different approaches to tackle the identified practical challenges, implemented both by the authors and by other organisations, are discussed and evaluated through flight experiments.

A case study on neuro-fuzzy architectures applied to the system identification of a reduced scale fighter aircraft

“…3 it is possible to see the layers that composethe Neuro-Fuzzy architecture. REVISTA OBSERVATORIO DE LA ECONOMIA LATINOAMERICANA Curitiba, v.22, n.1, p. 1898-1919. 2024.…”

A Cyber-Physical Prototyping and Testing Framework to Enable the Rapid Development of UAVs

“…However, in the case of UAV development, developers, especially researchers, often use existing COTS airframes that have limited parameters available. A review by Sobron et al of research platforms between 2010 and 2020 showed that at least 18 of the aircraft surveyed were developed from COTS airframes [81]. Beyond the scope of the aforementioned review, commercial (closed-design) airframes such as the UAV Factory Penguin airframe have been used as a basis by over 20 research institutions since 2010 with similarly limited parameters available [82].…”

“…There have also been studies of UAV performance through stall or upset maneuvers [11][12][13][14]. In addition, new aircraft configurations [15][16][17][18] and flight control hardware and software [19][20][21][22][23] have been tested. Research evaluating aircraft power consumption reduction through steady and dynamic soaring has also become the subject of significant attention recently [24][25][26][27][28].…”

Practical System Identification and Incremental Control Design for a Subscale Fixed-Wing Aircraft

“…Recent UAV flight test campaigns include [89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99], which also include flight testing with incremental type control laws in [100][101][102][103][104]. Subscale flight testing and system identification was performed in [105][106][107][108][109]. In [110], both system identification and control law design were performed for the longitudinal motion of a fixed wing UAV.…”