2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of creep analysis and design under multi-axial stress states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nondestructive inspection of the Takashi HONDA*, Takuya FUKAHORI*, Toshihide IGARI*, Yasuharu CHUMAN*, Takumi TOKIYOSHI* and Alan CF COCKS** surface and subsurface of pipe welds is carried out to examine the current damage, such as the cavity density, and the results are employed to guide simulation-based predictions. Several approaches can be taken in terms of damage simulation for Type IV failure, such as: continuum mechanics together with the stress-based time fraction or the ductility fraction of the material; creep fracture mechanics using the C* parameter (Yatomi et al, 2003, Segle et al, 2000; creep cavitation mechanics assuming diffusion (Rice, 1981); use of a grain boundary-resistance model (Fukahori, et al, 2013; and/or damage mechanics (Hyde et al, 2003, Yao et al, 2007. It remains difficult, however, to determine an optimal method for expressing both the microscopic and macroscopic phenomena of actual Type IV damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nondestructive inspection of the Takashi HONDA*, Takuya FUKAHORI*, Toshihide IGARI*, Yasuharu CHUMAN*, Takumi TOKIYOSHI* and Alan CF COCKS** surface and subsurface of pipe welds is carried out to examine the current damage, such as the cavity density, and the results are employed to guide simulation-based predictions. Several approaches can be taken in terms of damage simulation for Type IV failure, such as: continuum mechanics together with the stress-based time fraction or the ductility fraction of the material; creep fracture mechanics using the C* parameter (Yatomi et al, 2003, Segle et al, 2000; creep cavitation mechanics assuming diffusion (Rice, 1981); use of a grain boundary-resistance model (Fukahori, et al, 2013; and/or damage mechanics (Hyde et al, 2003, Yao et al, 2007. It remains difficult, however, to determine an optimal method for expressing both the microscopic and macroscopic phenomena of actual Type IV damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most used empirical model for modelling rock creep is the Norton Power Law, proposed in 1929 (Pinto, 1995;Yao, 2007;Cruz, 2003). It represents a constant strain rate, characteristic of the secondary creep, as shown in the following equation:…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature term considers the Arrhenius Law (Yao, 2007), Q represents the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant and T 0 is a temperature of reference. The term ε 0 represents a material parameter and σ 0 is a stress threshold: above σ 0 or below σ 0 different values of n are used, according to different creep mechanisms.…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations