1970
DOI: 10.2514/3.29911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of contemporary solid rocket motor performance prediction techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This raised concern on the stable burning of the propellant at low pressures. Hence detailed measurements were done in a newly developed burning rate measurement set-up working on ultrasonic technique 7 . Figure 8 provides the test results and pressure index estimated by this technique.…”
Section: Burning Rate Measurement and Burning Rate Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raised concern on the stable burning of the propellant at low pressures. Hence detailed measurements were done in a newly developed burning rate measurement set-up working on ultrasonic technique 7 . Figure 8 provides the test results and pressure index estimated by this technique.…”
Section: Burning Rate Measurement and Burning Rate Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows that the chamber pressure cannot maintain constant during combustion of the propellants, which is common in the case of small rocket motors with very short working times, and a proper grain selection can help in getting neutral burning only in the case of full-scale rocket motors [25]. In order to investigate the effect of pressure on the combustion products, the time-averaged pressure P c,av was used to characterize operation one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation predicts satisfactorily the motor performance with erosive burning under subsonic cross-flow conditions [14]. However, despite the absence of any correlation beyond this condition, it is assumed that the equation is valid also in the transonic and supersonic flow regimes.…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the port envelope, the iterative gas dynamic procedure is as follows. At time t, the head-end trial pressure p head is taken as the previously converged p head (however, at time t 0, p head is suitably estimated) [14]. The incremental integration of subsonic flow down the port up to the throat is performed by applying the mass, momentum and energy conservation equations [16].…”
Section: Methods Of Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation