2022 IEEE 10th Conference on Systems, Process &Amp; Control (ICSPC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icspc55597.2022.10001742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Commonly used Machine Learning Classifiers in Heart Disease Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model [16] is trained with 1025 Kaggle dataset which is a combination of four different datasets (Cleveland, Hungary, Long beach V and Switzerland) for heart disease prediction. Out of six classifiers Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naive bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), DT achieved more accuracy about 98%.…”
Section: Classical Learning (Supervised)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A model [16] is trained with 1025 Kaggle dataset which is a combination of four different datasets (Cleveland, Hungary, Long beach V and Switzerland) for heart disease prediction. Out of six classifiers Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naive bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), DT achieved more accuracy about 98%.…”
Section: Classical Learning (Supervised)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Forest classifier achieved good accuracy in prediction of heart disease [1,3,23,28,29]. In another study the model gave good accuracy, precision, and recall for Decision Tree [16]. In one of the studies KNN also achieved good accuracy in prediction [20].…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation