2009
DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-3-s6-s6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of COFRADIC techniques targeting protein N-terminal acetylation

Abstract: Acetylation of nascent protein N α -termini is a common modification among archae and eukaryotes and can influence the structure and function of target proteins. This modification has been studied on an individual protein or (synthetic) peptide level or on a proteome scale using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. We recently developed mass spectrometry driven proteome analytical approaches specifically targeting the amino (N) terminus of proteins based on the concept of diagonal reverse-phase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If needed, this labeling strategy allows for a straightforward calculation of the extent of N-terminal acetylation (29). After tryptic digestion, all protein N-terminal peptides will thus be blocked, whereas internal peptides acquired a newly generated primary ␣-amine, a property exploited to isolate N-terminal peptides from internal peptides in a diagonal chromatography setup that follows strong cation exchange enrichment at low pH (25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If needed, this labeling strategy allows for a straightforward calculation of the extent of N-terminal acetylation (29). After tryptic digestion, all protein N-terminal peptides will thus be blocked, whereas internal peptides acquired a newly generated primary ␣-amine, a property exploited to isolate N-terminal peptides from internal peptides in a diagonal chromatography setup that follows strong cation exchange enrichment at low pH (25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To elucidate the in vivo Nt-acetylomes of yNatB and hNatB and to delineate potential differences in their in vivo substrate specificity profiles in yeast, quantitative N-terminal COFRADIC analyses were performed (1,25), and the Nt-acetylation states of wild-type, yNatB-Δ and y[hNatB] yeast proteomes were compared. To distinguish between in vivo Nt-acetylated and non-Nt-acetylated N termini, we used chemical in vitro 13 C 2 D 3 -acetylation, which introduces a 5-Da mass spacing between the non-Nt-acetylated and Nt-acetylated N-terminal peptide form and thereby allows the calculation of the extent of Nt-acetylation (1,26). Overall, in the three yeast strains analyzed, 1,623 unique yeast N termini originating from 1,321 yeast proteins were identified (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this altered biophysical property was also exploited to enrich for protein N-termini using low pH strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography (24,39). As an example, SCX prefractionation combined with N-terminal combined fractional diagonal chromatography, a targeted proteomics technology negatively selecting for protein N-terminal peptides, stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture, and amino-directed modifiers (40), was used to study the in vivo substrate repertoires of human as well as yeast NatA (4). Nevertheless, the various methods reported today to study in detail N ␣ -terminal acetylation and thus the specificities of different NATs make use of a limited and therefore somewhat biased set of synthesized peptide substrates and comprise the rather laborious detection of radioactive acetylated products as well as enzyme-coupled methods quantifying acetylCoA conversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%