2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01073-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of clinical and oncological outcomes following the introduction of the first robotic colorectal surgery programme to a university teaching hospital in Ireland using a dual console training platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 In another recent report, the author surveyed the robotic surgery training curricula in general surgery, and reported difficulty in quantifying resident experience and assessing competence for safe robotic surgery practices since there has not yet been sufficient adoption of a standardized program. 30 Due to the characteristics of its modalities, robotic surgery requires attention to its unique disadvantage, in which losing sight of the instrument or the lack of tactile feedback could easily result in damage to other organs. Furthermore, when surgeons experienced difficult-tocontrol bleeding, it was difficult to convert from robotic to open surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 In another recent report, the author surveyed the robotic surgery training curricula in general surgery, and reported difficulty in quantifying resident experience and assessing competence for safe robotic surgery practices since there has not yet been sufficient adoption of a standardized program. 30 Due to the characteristics of its modalities, robotic surgery requires attention to its unique disadvantage, in which losing sight of the instrument or the lack of tactile feedback could easily result in damage to other organs. Furthermore, when surgeons experienced difficult-tocontrol bleeding, it was difficult to convert from robotic to open surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent criticisms of robotic surgery are those of increased cost and a longer operating time compared to laparoscopic approaches as a result of the expense of acquiring and utilizing robotic surgical systems and the learning curve associated with robotic docking [4,5]. The current literature reports that the additional cost of R-TAMIS compared to L-TAMIS is approximately €1000 per procedure [6]. This is not insignificant, but may be justified by the ergonomic advantages offered by robotic systems allowing safer and more efficient removal of rectal lesions [1-5, 7, 8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, the patient opted to proceed with R-TAMIS. The procedure was performed by a fellowshiptrained consultant colorectal surgeon on the specialist division of the medical register who had completed a proctorship programme in robotic colorectal surgery and achieved certification with the European Association of Robotic Colorectal Surgery [6]. The surgeon had also performed the required number of cases for competency in L-TAMIS [1].…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential obstacles include overcoming the learning curve, the potential harm to patients during residency training, and increased operative times during skill development. 12 Fleming et al, reported that oncologic outcomes for colon and rectal cancer while training residents on a dual console robotic platform has been shown to effectively have up to a 97% R0 resection rate. 12 While training residents in laparoscopy results in longer operative times, there was no difference in successful outcomes, reoperation, or complications versus the attending surgeons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Fleming et al, reported that oncologic outcomes for colon and rectal cancer while training residents on a dual console robotic platform has been shown to effectively have up to a 97% R0 resection rate. 12 While training residents in laparoscopy results in longer operative times, there was no difference in successful outcomes, reoperation, or complications versus the attending surgeons. 13 A large National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study found that training residents is safe for patient care despite a slight increase in operative time and surgical site infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%