2018
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update

Abstract: This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs, presents the principles of these methods and guidelines on when and how to use them. It also identifies a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
982
1
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,439 publications
(1,006 citation statements)
references
References 236 publications
8
982
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes intersubject variability, uncertain long-term effects, and the apparent failure of some individuals to achieve self-regulation (6). To tackle these issues, investigators have searched for better decoders of neural activity (7) as well as for psychological factors (8) and appropriate training regimens (9) that can influence the user's performance. On the other hand, neuroplasticity is thought to be crucial for achieving effective control and this has motivated a deeper understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms of neurofeedback and BCI learning (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes intersubject variability, uncertain long-term effects, and the apparent failure of some individuals to achieve self-regulation (6). To tackle these issues, investigators have searched for better decoders of neural activity (7) as well as for psychological factors (8) and appropriate training regimens (9) that can influence the user's performance. On the other hand, neuroplasticity is thought to be crucial for achieving effective control and this has motivated a deeper understanding of the neurophysiological mechanisms of neurofeedback and BCI learning (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning methods were originally developed in the computer vision field [48], and recently gained popularity in EEG analysis, in which they are used with the aim of improving classification performance over more traditional approaches, such as linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbours or SVMs [20]. ConvNets are a type of feed-forward deep learning networks that are useful when data have a known topological structure [19,25].…”
Section: Methodsological Aspects Of Movement Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, pattern recognition systems used to decode and predict movements require careful engineering and domain expertise to transform raw EEG signals (usually by means of a feature extraction subsystem) into a suitable representation for the classification stage [19]. In this regard, several techniques have been proposed for feature extraction, e.g., common spatial patterns, independent component analysis, and joint timefrequency analysis, and also for classification, e.g., nearest neighbour classifier, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machines (SVMs), and ensemble strategies, among others [20]. An alternative is to use representation learning methods that automatically perform a feature extraction and classification through optimisation algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly put, an RL agent takes states and rewards as inputs and yields an output action at a given time-step. States correspond to the binned spike firing rates sensed from micro-electrode arrays whereas rewards are scalar values obtained as a result of action taken at the previous **This work was supported through grant RG87/ 16 time-step. The notion of learning involves maximizing the score of total reward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%