2018
DOI: 10.31387/oscm0350214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Behavioral Decision Making in the Newsvendor Problem

Abstract: Schweitzer and Cachon (2000) demonstrated that choices of decision-maker in the newsvendor problem setting systematically deviate from those that maximize their expected profit. Since then, a large body of empirical and theoretical studies has been published to describe the newsvendor decisionmaking behavior. To establish further, the purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it identifies the various behavioral theories and biases that explain the newsvendor behavior by employing a systematic literature review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results corroborate previous findings and reiterate the notion that planners exhibit judgment bias—and consequently a decision bias—when preparing for marketing campaigns by over‐ordering (e.gFildes et al 2019; Tokar et al 2011, 2014). This behavior leads to persistent under‐forecasting as the campaign unfolds, as planners anchor their ordering decisions (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) in the successful outcome of strong retail store sales lift (Katok et al 2008; Schweitzer & Cachon, 2000; Sharma & Nandi, 2018). Yet, planners induce over‐forecasting in the period immediately following the campaign, as they update over‐optimistic forecasts according to the heightened level of orders observed during the campaign, while actual order levels to replenish distribution centers decrease as retail store sales lifts no longer occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results corroborate previous findings and reiterate the notion that planners exhibit judgment bias—and consequently a decision bias—when preparing for marketing campaigns by over‐ordering (e.gFildes et al 2019; Tokar et al 2011, 2014). This behavior leads to persistent under‐forecasting as the campaign unfolds, as planners anchor their ordering decisions (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) in the successful outcome of strong retail store sales lift (Katok et al 2008; Schweitzer & Cachon, 2000; Sharma & Nandi, 2018). Yet, planners induce over‐forecasting in the period immediately following the campaign, as they update over‐optimistic forecasts according to the heightened level of orders observed during the campaign, while actual order levels to replenish distribution centers decrease as retail store sales lifts no longer occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding to statistical approach on supply chain management research, a theoretical model develops, describes and clarifies a situation related to a problem, and through the data collection or literature, the relationships between variables are examined. A good theoretical model defines the important changes in the context related to the problem and theory and explains the interactive relationship between the variables (Sharma & Nandi, 2018;González-Teruel & Pérez-Pulido, 2020). This study examines supply chain management by reviewing the development of theoretical models of supply chain management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konsumen juga akan memberikan rekomendasi kepada pihak lain untuk samasama menggunakan layanan jasa tersebut. (Sharma & Nandi, 2018). Manfaat lainnya adalah layanan prima mampu memenuhi standar mutu yang telah ditentukan (Rangkuti, 2017 (Adiyanto, 2019).…”
Section: Layananunclassified