2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of artificial intelligence based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
207
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
207
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they concluded that ensemble modelling (which consists in the association of several single models), in this case (SVR + ANN), had even better performance than single modelling. Wang and Srinivasan came to a similar conclusion in their review since they found that ensemble models have better prediction accuracy than single models (multiple linear regression [MLR], ANN, and SVR). Massana et al found similar results comparing ANN and linear regression for electric load forecasting of a nonresidential building, but in their application, SVR was slightly better than ANN.…”
Section: Neural Network Applications Over a Building's Lifementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they concluded that ensemble modelling (which consists in the association of several single models), in this case (SVR + ANN), had even better performance than single modelling. Wang and Srinivasan came to a similar conclusion in their review since they found that ensemble models have better prediction accuracy than single models (multiple linear regression [MLR], ANN, and SVR). Massana et al found similar results comparing ANN and linear regression for electric load forecasting of a nonresidential building, but in their application, SVR was slightly better than ANN.…”
Section: Neural Network Applications Over a Building's Lifementioning
confidence: 78%
“…They produced a very complete review of the studies involving machine learning with a particular focus on the buildings type, temporal granularities, sort of energy consumption predicted, origin of data, kind of features, data sizes, and performance of the model. Wang and Srinivasan conducted a review on energy use prediction, not only on artificial intelligence based models but also on ensemble models, which consist in the association of several single prediction models for a better accuracy. Deb et al also wrote a review dealing with forecasting techniques, but they give to the reader a more precise state of the art regarding ensemble modelling (also called “hybrid modelling”), which appears to be the most effective forecasting technique modelling for time‐series analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned algorithms can be called the single AI-based method. To eliminate several essential limitations in these algorithms, researchers also propose hybrid methods that integrate at least two AI algorithms, such as the GA-ANN [33] and PSO-GA models [12][13][14][15][16], to improve the prediction accuracy. The hybrid combination of a single AI algorithm shows greater performance compared with other methods.…”
Section: Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current AI-based energy demand forecasting model does not determine this historical relationship through econometric and statistical analysis. This condition can be recognized as a "black-box" without knowing the internal relationship between energy demand and its affecting factors [33]. Accordingly, this model cannot be adopted for energy demand prediction when the historical relationship estimated through the AI-based model will change over time.…”
Section: Introduction To Ai-based Energy Demand Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooling load calculation is the first step for the design of building air conditioning systems because the transmission and distribution system, the size of the ultimate system and cooling resources, and the control strategies of the whole air conditioning system are all dependent on the cooling load [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%