1991
DOI: 10.1080/10643389109388408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of arsenic (III) in groundwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
215
0
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
215
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The low Mn content of the soil apparently seems to be inconsistent with the strong decrease of the Mn concentration in the slack water, which would imply a similar behaviour to Fe, with a considerable enrichment in the upper soil layers. This may be explained by the difference in the redox behaviour of the two elements, Mn(IV) being reduced at a higher redox potential than required for Fe, even before the complete consumption of dissolved O 2 (Korte and Fernando, 1991). Consequently, Mn-oxyhydroxides precipitated from the water are almost completely leached from the upper soil and transported downwards into deeper soil horizons.…”
Section: Sequential Extraction Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low Mn content of the soil apparently seems to be inconsistent with the strong decrease of the Mn concentration in the slack water, which would imply a similar behaviour to Fe, with a considerable enrichment in the upper soil layers. This may be explained by the difference in the redox behaviour of the two elements, Mn(IV) being reduced at a higher redox potential than required for Fe, even before the complete consumption of dissolved O 2 (Korte and Fernando, 1991). Consequently, Mn-oxyhydroxides precipitated from the water are almost completely leached from the upper soil and transported downwards into deeper soil horizons.…”
Section: Sequential Extraction Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] The source of arsenic is the special underground geochemical condition by which arsenic is mobilized as soluble species in the groundwater, primarily, mobilization by dissolution within the sediment by virtual quantitative reduction of As(V) to As(III). [5][6][7][8] Groundwater is the primary source of drinking water for millions of people in Bangladesh and neighboring India. It is mostly pumped out by hand-operated tubewells (with a metal casing) from 30-200 feet underground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As(III) is the dominant arsenic species in groundwater, while As(V) is the main arsenic species in surface water. The toxicity of As(III) is about 25-60 times higher than that of As(V) [9], and it is more difficult to remove As(III) than that of As(V), because the adsorption capacity of As(III) is quite lower than that of As(V). Thus, a pretreatment for As(III) oxidation to As(V) before adsorption process is required for its effective removal from water [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%