2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review: Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence and robotics in the offshore wind sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent unexpected failures in the jacket structures, it is necessary to conduct real-time SHM. [14][15][16][17] Generally, the design life of an offshore wind turbine is 20 years, 18 and the life can be extended to a maximum of another 10 years by performing proper SHM. 19 The SHM often includes four objectives: damage identification, damage localization, damage quantification, and RUL estimation.…”
Section: Structure Health Monitoring Of Offshore Jacket Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent unexpected failures in the jacket structures, it is necessary to conduct real-time SHM. [14][15][16][17] Generally, the design life of an offshore wind turbine is 20 years, 18 and the life can be extended to a maximum of another 10 years by performing proper SHM. 19 The SHM often includes four objectives: damage identification, damage localization, damage quantification, and RUL estimation.…”
Section: Structure Health Monitoring Of Offshore Jacket Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reiman et al [75] also reviewed the ergonomics and other human factors in the context of the growing prevalence of industry 4.0 systems. Mitchell et al [76] reviewed the applications of robotics and artificial intelligence in wind infrastructure lifecycle management with special emphasis on offshore platforms. Forcina et al [77] reviewed how industry 4.0 technologies make modern factories safer for humans.…”
Section: A Related Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Multi-Robot (MR) fleets operating in dangerous environments, such as discussed in this article for the nuclear sector, resilience and coordination of robots at a distance in a safe environment from a user interface by a human are identified as additional key challenges in the future [19]. The advancement of MRfleets represents a key opportunity to maximise the characteristics from a range of robots to improve IMR activities, productivity (due to the ability to complete tasks in parallel) and resilience in operations [14,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the current state-of-the-art for robots in nuclear environments, systems are deployed individually and evaluated under single use-case deployments via a sequence of events where in most examples, when safety is increased via robotics, efficiency decreases [10,11]. In addition, presently sectors such as defence [12], offshore (inclusive of both renewable and petrochemical domains) [13,14], healthcare [15], logistics [16] and agriculture [17] are also actively assessing the merits of deploying individual mobile robots. These evaluations aim to validate the accrued benefits of single-unit deployments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation