2001
DOI: 10.1007/s102090100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities

Abstract: With over thirty million individuals with disabilities being reported in the United States, and with information systems permeating nearly every aspect of society, there is a growing urgency to ensure that everyone has equal access to technology. To render information technologies universally accessible, researchers must have at their disposal an accurate and reliable user model. Through the use of the conceptual framework presented here, accurate assumptions can be generated from knowledge of an individual's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Designers should embrace inclusive values from the outset of design and create opportunities for users to participate in the creation of the online community from the outset. Without universal design, universal access cannot be achieved, as universal access inherently means designing, developing, and implementing ICTs to meet the needs of all users (Buhler, 2001;Goggin & Newell, 2000;Jacko & Vintense, 2001).…”
Section: Participatory Design and Developing Best Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designers should embrace inclusive values from the outset of design and create opportunities for users to participate in the creation of the online community from the outset. Without universal design, universal access cannot be achieved, as universal access inherently means designing, developing, and implementing ICTs to meet the needs of all users (Buhler, 2001;Goggin & Newell, 2000;Jacko & Vintense, 2001).…”
Section: Participatory Design and Developing Best Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated previously, limitations to human functioning can be categorized into four areas: visual impairment, speech/hearing impairments, cognitive impairments, and physical/ motor impairments. In their work aimed at deriving a framework of functional ability, Jacko and Vitense (2001) illustrated that each of these categories involves a unique set of clinical diagnoses. The clinical diagnoses determine the ability of the user to provide and receive information critical to the efficacy and efficiency of interacting with technology.…”
Section: Framework Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual function is most commonly assessed in terms of visual acuity (e.g., 20/20). In addition to visual acuity, other visual functions that may be used to characterize low vision include color perception, contrast sensitivity, eye movements, and visual fields (Jacko & Sears, 1998;Jacko & Vitense, 2001). Table 5.3 provides a definition of each component of visual function, the impact it can have on computer use, and common, clinically based assessment techniques.…”
Section: Classifying Visual Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most universal accessibility solutions have been studied in the interface level, by improving the software interfaces to suit the users [K98]. Other works address the use of assistive technology such as access equipment and input devices, and show how such tools can be made more popular by alleviating some of the accessibility issues [JV01]. Universal Design techniques have been applied to information technologies to make all information perceivable, including keys and controls, facilitate navigation, and ensure compatibility with commonly used assistive technology [JV01,SS01].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the abilityrequirements approach also accounts for the abilities that are primarily affected as well as other abilities that are affected as a result. For instance, even a mild hearing loss of (25 -40dB) might result in mild language retardation [JV01].…”
Section: An Ability Driven Approach To Transcodingmentioning
confidence: 99%