2018
DOI: 10.1080/20742835.2018.1467998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A retrospective study of stage IB node-negative cervical cancer treated with adjuvant radiation with standard pelvic versus central small pelvic fields

Abstract: Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study of patients with stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical surgery between 1984 and 2010. Node-negative patients regarded as at risk of pelvic recurrence received PORT, with or without concurrent cisplatin or additional vaginal brachytherapy. The PORT was given with either whole pelvis fields (WPF), or with central small pelvic fields (SPF). Data concerning indications for adjuvant therapy, treatment outcomes and grade 3-4 treatmentrelated toxiciti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 36 , 74 Some institutions have increased capacity and are participating in research. 75 , 76 Only 4% of surveyed centers noted participation in clinical trials; reasons included limited funding, high workload, and inabilities to meet trial requirements at their center. 14 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 36 , 74 Some institutions have increased capacity and are participating in research. 75 , 76 Only 4% of surveyed centers noted participation in clinical trials; reasons included limited funding, high workload, and inabilities to meet trial requirements at their center. 14 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%