OBJECTIVESA prospective study to compare weekly cisplatin versus weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma cervix.
METHODSThe study was carried out between November 2013 and August 2104; 60 newly diagnosed women with histopathologically proven squamous cell carcinoma cervix (FIGO stage IB2 to IVA were enrolled into this study and randomized to receive on weekly basis either 40 mg/m 2 cisplatin (Control Group: 30 patients) or 50 mg/m 2 paclitaxel (Study Group: 30 patients) concurrently with radiotherapy total dose for radiotherapy 80 Gy for both the groups (50 Gy from EBRT and 30 Gy from HDR brachytherapy). Followup time was 6 months.
RESULTSThe mean number of chemotherapy cycles was comparable with 86.7% and 80% of patients receiving 5 doses in control and study group respectively. At the completion of treatment 20 patients (66.7%) in control group and 15 patients (50%) in study group had complete response; 10 patients (33.3%) in control group and 15 patients (50%) in study group had partial response. After 6 months of followup, 23 patients (76.7%) in control group and 19 (63.3%) patients of study group had complete response and 7 (23.4%) patients of control group and 10 (33.4%) patients of study group had partial response respectively. One patient of study group developed progressive disease during followup period.
CONCLUSIONThis small prospective study shows that weekly paclitaxel does not provide any clinical advantage over weekly cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced carcinoma cervix and associated with more gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities.