2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Retrospective Study of Oral Emergency Services During COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The least-urgent cases of this study decreased like the relative emergencies in our study [12]. In the study by Guo et al a decrease of relative emergencies by more than 50% was noted, which again supports our observation [7]. In that study, a similar volume of patients (12,416) were included, as in our investigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The least-urgent cases of this study decreased like the relative emergencies in our study [12]. In the study by Guo et al a decrease of relative emergencies by more than 50% was noted, which again supports our observation [7]. In that study, a similar volume of patients (12,416) were included, as in our investigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1). This effect has also been found in other studies regarding dental and non-dental emergencies during the pandemic [5][6][7]. Other investigators found the absence of patients in the pandemic being triggered by the fear of infection [8,9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results from the present study showed that, during the lockdown, a small percentage of patients experienced dental pain (13.6%) or had to visit the dentist for urgent care (16.5%). These findings are compatible with those in the study by Docimo et al 10 but not with other studies reporting dental pain in 30%–38% of the children 4,6,16,21 . This difference could be attributed to the variations in restrictions set by the health ministries in each country.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%